PersingEP@... wrote: > > Well...there is so little "real" performace increase from a single processor > Mac with current Logic, and a dual processor. I heard it is something like > MIDI and the Graphics are loaded to one processor? That's not the important > stuff of course. We need native FX and instruments to be split between the > processors to see the real increase. Hi Eric, The live inputs and the currently selected audio instrument ar also handled by the second processor. George Leger posted a sweet little tip on the LUG as to how to get them most out of the live inputs. Physically connect the spare outputs of your audio interface to some spare inputs. Then create live input objects for these inputs. The live inputs of course have inserts. So insert processor intensive plugins in them (reverbs, etc). The plugins, being instantiated on live inserts, will now be handled by the second processor. And they will be accessible to your audio stream by setting the output assignment of some busses to correspond with those physically patched outputs. Then just send to those busses from your audio tracks's sends. It's a sweet idea to maximize performance! I wish I had a DP Mac!!! -- Eli Krantzberg Nightshift Orchestra / Almat Productions http://www.nightshiftorchestra.com
Message
Re: [exs] Logic on a mac
2002-07-09 by Eli Krantzberg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.