Murray McDowall wrote: > Rene's waveforms for Pentagon 1 -- look at the wavetables in an editor -- might > make a good source. They are alias free and there is a cycle for each midi note > (128 of them). Tried them allready - not a bad source, but I had problems tuning some of them though, for *whatever* reasons. I might give them another try though. > I would expect short wave samples to be out of tune due to sampling being based > discrete numbers of samples. So a 1kHz wave is really only 44 samples per > cycle if you are sampling at 44.1kHz. If you loop 44 samples you will get a > periodic function that is 0.2% too short. A 6%frequency change is a semitone > so you are likely to be something like 3 cent sharp on that example. Yeah, I allready suspected something similar like that. But WaveLab seems to be somewhat *more* inaccurate. > Better tuning would result from more cycles looped say 10 or more at higher > frequencies -- pitch errors are smaller for bass notes of course since they > will contain more samples per cycle. Of course. Cheers, Sascha
Message
Re: [exs] 9 simple Waveform Patches
2002-07-17 by Sascha Franck
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.