Phil Buckle wrote: > > You may want to think about investing in a Giga Sampler PC rig and leave the > EXS for smaller things. If your going to sketch things out anyway you may as > well use what most film/orchestral composers are using these days and speak > the common language. > Here in Australia the trend is also toward Gigasampler amongst the "pros". > Emagic have clearly shown their intentions with such slow development and > the more modern music culture slant of their products. Gigasampler has now > established itself as the most innovative tool for your type of work. > I'm starting to wonder how good Gigasampler would be with my loop and drum > library, I'm going to have to get a PC rig to stay in the "loop" with all > the other composers around me anyway. In a way Gigasampler has become like > ProTools. Everybody is sharing work and sending their files from one studio > to another and sharing the work load. I did get a number of my friends to > try the EXS but they have all since bought GigaSampler. > Didn't intend to turn your question in to a rant but I think you might be > investing time and effort in to the wrong software. > By the way to bring things more on topic: I think you can "almost" replace a > 60 piece orchestra with a combination of real players and samples. I've just > finished 2 projects that did just that. One had 15 players and the other had > 10. Both scores were fleshed out with samples. Both those composers were > using EXS and now have Gigasampler. > Phil Buckle. Hmmm, interesting points Phil. I wonder if the situation'll change though? Like maybe when the mysterious "EXS24 II" mentioned on the Vienna Symphonic site appears? I can't help wondering if the EXS24 is in for some serious overhaul considering that Vineea Symphonic have seen fit to choose it for the Mac side of their sample libraries?
Message
Re: [exs] orchestral programmers in london?
2002-11-14 by Bill Canty
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.