At 08:57 AM 11/22/02 +0100, you wrote: >PersingEP@... wrote > > The Lowpass filters sound different to me.....I wonder are they the same? >The > > EXS MkI sounds fatter to me....just my first impression, maybe I'm nuts. >The > > HP and BP filters are a great addition, wish the FAT function worked > > though...only seems to have an effect on 24db Low Pass. On the ES2 the Fat > > function seemed to work on all the filters. > >You are right, I did a test (bouncing, importing, inverting and crossplaying >the same songfile in 5.0 and 5.5) and the filters aren't identical. Seems as >if the MK I filter is resonating a bit more. >Unlike you, I ain't no Mr. Golden Ears (I am serious about that), so >eventually I might not even have noticed this, but in an A/B comparison of >the files the differences just became pretty much apparent, even without the >phase cancellation test. But... the PDF says they are 100% exactly the same. Don't take this as if I read manuals, I don't. =) ...neither do any of my customers.. =) =) =) >I also agree with you that the ease of editing the most important parameters >is gone now - not because of the simple lack of proper sliders (as Ben said, >it's all there once you recall the EXS Mk I settings) but because of the >tiny-ness of the new modulation sliders. Time to get a 640x480 monitor! =) Is there a legitimate control board for this type of thing? Wouldn't it be great to have a standardized USB spec that would do control stuff like this? >IMO It'd be nice if one could switch between "classic" and "MK II" GUI modes. So, the possibilities are: OSX-MKII Mode OSX-Classic Mode Classic-Classic Mode Classic-MkII Mode System 7-Logic 2 Mode Garth Hjelte Sampler User
Message
Re: [exs] EXS24 MKII
2002-11-22 by Rubber Chicken Software Co.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.