Howdy, The Groove Control™ system in Stylus works off the same "slicing" principle as ReCycle, but the quality of Groove Control is much higher and more reliable than only ReCycle can do. The reason is because we use a lot of special techniques to create seamless slices, including some special tools and a lot of experience and painstaking work to create these GC files. With something like ReCycke, you can get good results sometimes, but not always...and it can be a huge amount of work. Grove Control products have been around for a few years now too, and were available in stereo a couple of years before ReCycle 2 came out. So Groove Control products like Stylus are "pre-sliced" yes....but they are also a great deal higher in quality and flexibility because of the way that we create the Groove Control files. The result is better than any other slicing method because you can seamlessly slow down the grooves by quite a bit more than the average REX file. (This is also a big difference compared to Phatmatic Pro, which is a great product, but currently cannot slow down a groove without gaps). The video states that Stylus is the world's first Groove Control virtual instrument....that's all. The integration of the Stylus software engine, with all the GC files offers some unique capabilities, including the ability to completely transform each slice independantly...which is pretty cool. Also, you'll see the integration of the software and samples in Stylus do some really new stuff in 2003...since we have our own software instrument now, we can make it do all kinds of new things in the future, that will further separate it from what the traditional REX method has offered in the past. I'm the first to say that we didn't invent the "slicing" idea...credit for = that should go to the props.....with Groove Control, we just figured out how to make that idea a lot better, and will continue to develop it more and more in the future! Hope that clarifies the origins of Stylus and Groove Control. I don't think we ever said "revolutionary"....but I'm sure some Stylus users have said so.... Happy New year! EP from Spectrasonics --- In exs-users@yahoogroups.com, "darealbasoski <mail@o...>" <mail@o...> wrote: > in the demo-video of Stylus it's presented as an incredibly > powerfull thing, which I'm sure it is, but what in the WORLD has > a gadget such as this one (and the obvious tons of clones to > follow) have to offer that is actually new??? Isn't this a simplyfied > way of mangling loops till they fit nicely and make up a new one? > > Well then... > ...excuse me for asking, but isn't that what a lot of us have been > doing allready for years? Are Spectrasonics not just offering a > slick-interfaced Recycle-clone here? Where'd they find the guts > to actually go out and tell the world they've done an amazing > discovery...? > > Personaly I've been using Recycle eversince version 1.0 and I > doubt it's ever going to leave my Mac, but isn't this sort of a > 'Preset-Recycle'...? > Oh well, at least the price is pretty tight, 3gig's worth of sample > material is always an excuse to go for it anyway. > > Just had to get this off my chest:) > Happy Stylussing, > O.
Message
Re: Just a thought 'bout Stylus and Phatmatik and such....
2002-12-31 by spectrumep <PersingEP@aol.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.