My point is it could have been far better with not much more effort, certainly not any more expertise. What they are charging is a complete rip-off unless you've got money to spare. For me personally, the one-octave crap is unforgivable. If it works for you, great! I'm happy for you (seriously), but I think for anybody in search of a "virtual guitar" the instrument is completely laughable. I'm not saying the existing sounds suck, although their generic quality leaves passion to the wayside IMO. What I am saying is that I still have to hire a session player and am out hundreds of dollars anyway (not really... I sold it). Alas, I've beaten this dead horse to a pulp and I digress heavily. I just don't understand why anyone would be impressed with this, dare I say, instrument. Let me say this in closing. If it were at least 2-3 octaves of samples, I would have kept it. 11 keys is a joke if you ask me. It's like asking to play Mozart on a xylophone. Sure it sounds nice... to a point. -Jer > It's not a guitar library and isn't sold as one. But I just don't > understand why everyone disses it so much. It is what it is: a > limited but useful guitar part generator. > > I don't think its design is conducive to great art, but then you > could say that of most products on the market.
Message
Re: [exs] Re: guitar libraries
2003-02-09 by Jer Olsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.