> Beware other people's recommendations, you have to try it. One > person's "sparkling" is another's "jangly". The top end of a sampled > grand is the holy grail. I spent money on "The Grand" only to end up > with something inferior to Splendid Grand because the top is so > brittle and useless in a mix. Splendid Grand is pretty good in a > mix, but I think not so nice for a piano player to play. I agree, moreover they were not recorder with the same mic position which gives different results for a mix. Some pianos were recorded with a pianist perspective, one mic on the left and one on the right, the result is that it is satisfying for a pianist because it will give him the same kind of sound as he was playing on a real piano. But when you want to include that piano in a mix then you will be disappointed because usually a piano is never recorded that way in a studio. Your mix will not sound like with a real piano because your ear is used to hear a different kind of mic positionning. A good mic positionning for a mix on the other end will not satisfy a piano player. Anyway I think it's difficult to have a sampled piano very good for a mix and very nice for a piano player to play. There is a web site where you can listen to the same midi file rendered by different sampled pianos: http://www.gigfiles.com Bernard
Message
Re: Bardstown Audio Bosendorfer Grand Piano vs Post Grandioso Bosendorfer 290
2003-04-07 by bernard chavonnet
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.