From: Dan Chapman <dan@...> >Also please check out this comparison site: > >http://www.gigfiles.com/keyboards-piano-grand-compare.asp I was wondering what happened to those recordings I made for him! Thanks for the link. For some reason (perhaps a corrupted MP3?) he didn't put up the best recording I sent him: the Kurzweil K250 - from 1984. The K2500's new piano is quite good, and the same samples as the K250's in the K2000, 1000PX, and K2500 (it has the old piano as well) just don't stand up to the K250. Of course, it has problems - only one velocity layer, and not a lot of air (since it's limited to 12k). But it's still incredibly playable. To me, all the sampled examples on that site sound pretty sad next to the one of the real piano - and that real piano recording is awful. While they all have more clarity, the sampled pianos have much rougher dynamics than the real one. Their envelopes are also wrong, possibly due to overzealous use of compression and possibly due to the way they're recorded. And they all have a slightly plastic and brittle sound quality, especially in the midrange. And while the explanation on that site is a little funky, he's right to point out that they all have some phasing problems to one degree or another. Maybe if you could sample every possible combination of notes with the pedal up and down, with many more velocity layers... -- Nick Batzdorf 818/905-9101, cell 590-9101, fax 905-5434
Message
Re: Piano samples
2003-06-16 by Nick Batzdorf
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.