on 6/30/03 12:56 PM, Andy Hardwake at digitalmechanics@... wrote: On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 09:18 AM, James Ryan wrote: > > Yeah, Garth is great with that. I'll give the new one a try. And that's why I stick with Translator since its day 1, cause he does his best to keep his promisses. But (and I ask this not to start a CDXtract/Translator flame war, but rather to have more knowledge on the subject) since James said his choice would be CDXtract (the product which I know absolutely nothing about), what do I lose as a faithful Translator user? Any ***objective*** feature list of dos and don'ts with each of the 2? TIA. Best, Andy (a satisfied Translator user) Truthfully, with Garth's post that the Kurzweil thing is cleared up, it becomes more an issue of which interface you like the best. I find getting around CDXtract a little more easy and intuitive, but someone else may say just the opposite. If you're happy with Translator, stay where you are. If the uber programmer of Translator reads this list and responds with fixes, you can't go wrong. Spend your money on a cool sample CD! James [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [EXS]CDXtract: the best?
2003-06-30 by James Ryan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.