EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Thread

Re: Re: Mbox problems (?) and MOTU 828 question

Re: Re: Mbox problems (?) and MOTU 828 question

2004-07-02 by Nick Batzdorf

From: Bill Canty <Bill@...>

>Yeah, I know. I'd be constantly plugging and unplugging synths, but the
>rack is arranged so that's very easy to do. But the Mbox's biggest
>advantage... (drum roll...) is that I already own one.

This is why God created mixers, no?
-- 

Nick Batzdorf
818/905-9101, cell 590-9101, fax 905-5434

Re: Mbox problems (?) and MOTU 828 question

2004-07-02 by bill_canty

--- In exs-users@yahoogroups.com, Nick Batzdorf <recording@e...> wrote:
>   From: Bill Canty <Bill@C...>
> 
>>Yeah, I know. I'd be constantly plugging and unplugging synths, but the
> >rack is arranged so that's very easy to do. But the Mbox's biggest
> >advantage... (drum roll...) is that I already own one.
> 
> This is why God created mixers, no?

Of course! :o)

But I haven't yet managed to con God into providing me with all the
gear I'd like, e.g. a mixer that's high-quality enough to add no noise
to the signal. So until I find out exactly which prayer accomplishes
this, i figure it'd be best to bypass my el-cheapo mixer whenever I
digitize a synth part, non? ;-)

Re: Re: Mbox problems (?) and MOTU 828 question

2004-07-03 by Nick Batzdorf

>  > This is why God created mixers, no?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  From: "bill_canty" <Bill@...>

>Of course! :o)
>
>But I haven't yet managed to con God into providing me with all the
>gear I'd like, e.g. a mixer that's high-quality enough to add no noise
>to the signal. So until I find out exactly which prayer accomplishes
>this, i figure it'd be best to bypass my el-cheapo mixer whenever I
>digitize a synth part, non? ;-)

Mais non. Vous avez demandez les questions in the context of whether 
to get an 828 for a few hundred bucks so you could have multiple 
outputs. A used Mackie CR1202 - $100? - is plenty quiet for submixing 
synthesizers.
-- 
___
Nick Batzdorf
818/905-9101, fax -5434, cell 590-9101

Re: [EXS] Re: Re: Mbox problems (?) and MOTU 828 question

2004-07-03 by Bill Canty

Nick Batzdorf wrote:
> 
> Mais non. Vous avez demandez les questions in the context of whether 
> to get an 828 for a few hundred bucks so you could have multiple 
> outputs.

Not quite. Multiple INputs.

> A used Mackie CR1202 - $100?

Not in Australia, mon ami.

> - is plenty quiet for submixing 
> synthesizers.

Mais oui, but space is also an important consideration. I'd rather treat 
the back of my current mixer and the back of a 2-input audio thingie 
(e.g. Mbox, US-122) as a patchbay than have to rearrange my rack, desk 
and powerboards.

And, as mentioned in another post, I'm hoping the sale of Mbox and 
current mixer will pay for an 828. Problem solved! (Fingers crossed!!!)


Cheers,   Bill, whose complete French vocab has just been displayed ;-)

Re: Re: Re: Re: Mbox problems (?) and MOTU 828 question

2004-07-04 by Nick Batzdorf

From: Bill Canty <Bill@...>

>PS: an 828 is also only half the size of my current mixer, and about 1/4
>the size of the current mixer, Mbox, and a Mackie 1202 combined.

Ah oui. J'ai un 828 de MOTU, le premiere edition, et il et tres bon.

Et maintenant je fermai la bouche, parce-que j'ai exhaust\ufffd mon 
vocabulaire compl\ufffdte aussi.

Sprechen sie Deutsche? Nicht Mir.
-- 

Nick Batzdorf
818/905-9101, cell 590-9101, fax 905-5434

Re: [EXS] Re: Re: Re: Re: Mbox problems (?) and MOTU 828 question

2004-07-04 by Bill Canty

Nick Batzdorf wrote:
> 
> Ah oui. J'ai un 828 de MOTU, le premiere edition, et il et tres bon.
 >
> Et maintenant je fermai la bouche, parce-que j'ai exhaust\ufffd mon 
> vocabulaire compl\ufffdte aussi.

I can still understand you though. :o) Funny how French to English is 
easier than the other way round for someone who hasn't studied it for... 
vingt-six ans.

> Sprechen sie Deutsche?

Ein bi\ufffdchen, but let's not go there! =:-O

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.