EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Thread

wav vs aif vs SDII

wav vs aif vs SDII

2005-03-11 by alecwhiting

I have up till now never thought of a reason why I should have a 
preference between wav or aif.

I tend to have all three in my samples used with esx.

However recently I had a problem where a song was open with two 
exs's, one had wav one had aif. The aif one however couldn't see its 
files, although I verified there presence where they should have 
been. It just refused to see them.

So I went back to the prosamples cd and replaced the aifs with wavs 
and then everything worked fine.

Also does anyone know, when you convert a 24bit file to 16 using 
logic save file, with lower than current bit depth, does this mean 
that logic is dealing with dithering for you when it converts. I am 
worried I will one day find noise in the esx samples I have created. 
The logic manual I have is poor on this subject.

Best Regards

Alec

Re: wav vs aif vs SDII

2005-03-11 by bernard chavonnet

Even though the ProSamples CDs have all samples available
in .wav and .aif files, the EXS24 instruments use the wav files
only. This is something that I verified on 2 prosamples CDs.
The aif files on these CDs are useless.

Bernard

----- Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "alecwhiting" <alec@...>
To: <exs-users@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 6:37 AM
Subject: [EXS] wav vs aif vs SDII


> 
> 
> 
> I have up till now never thought of a reason why I should have a 
> preference between wav or aif.
> 
> I tend to have all three in my samples used with esx.
> 
> However recently I had a problem where a song was open with two 
> exs's, one had wav one had aif. The aif one however couldn't see its 
> files, although I verified there presence where they should have 
> been. It just refused to see them.
> 
> So I went back to the prosamples cd and replaced the aifs with wavs 
> and then everything worked fine.
> 
> Also does anyone know, when you convert a 24bit file to 16 using 
> logic save file, with lower than current bit depth, does this mean 
> that logic is dealing with dithering for you when it converts. I am 
> worried I will one day find noise in the esx samples I have created. 
> The logic manual I have is poor on this subject.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Alec
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________
>                          EXS* Users Group
> - To UNSUBSCRIBE: email exs-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> - EXS/Logic FAQ: http://logicfaq.omega-art.com/
> - Free legal samples: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exs-users/links/
> - To contact list admins, email exs-users-owner@yahoogroups.com 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Re: [EXS] wav vs aif vs SDII

2005-03-11 by David Gordon

On 3/11/05 3:37 AM, "alecwhiting" <alec@...> wrote:

> I have up till now never thought of a reason why I should have a
> preference between wav or aif.
> 
> I tend to have all three in my samples used with esx.
> 
> However recently I had a problem where a song was open with two
> exs's, one had wav one had aif. The aif one however couldn't see its
> files, although I verified there presence where they should have
> been. It just refused to see them.
> 
> So I went back to the prosamples cd and replaced the aifs with wavs
> and then everything worked fine.
> 
> Also does anyone know, when you convert a 24bit file to 16 using
> logic save file, with lower than current bit depth, does this mean
> that logic is dealing with dithering for you when it converts. I am
> worried I will one day find noise in the esx samples I have created.
> The logic manual I have is poor on this subject.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Alec

There is no dithering, it¹s just a truncation.

If you want dithering to 16-bits you have to first bounce the file with
dithering, then convert.

* Dave

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.