EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Thread

Re: [exs] EXS 24 sample Cd´s for swop!

Re: [exs] EXS 24 sample Cd´s for swop!

2001-12-18 by Kaveh Cohen

Alvaro, you very well may see people all over the world doing all sorts of
things, however if any of those things are not legal, I would encourage you to
better inform yourself and not take part in it.  The trading of samples CD's
not being legal is no new news.  This has been the case for a very long time.
But more important than that is the inherent respect due to those who spend
endless hours creating the very sounds that make up what is the bulk of music
today.  Many composers and producers would be rendered literally mute were it
not for indispensable artists like Eric Persing who toil for months on end to
bring us the most realistic and cutting edge sounds in a small package for much
less money and time that it would take us to do it ourselves.

Another thing to consider when trading discs is the sheer cost of developing
the library, especially if it is an acoustic library such as a choir or
orchestra set.  The developer must hire an orchestra, place the players in a
rented hall, hire an engineer and rent the equipment to capture the
performance, then hire programmers to port the finished samples to the many
available formats.  This requires money.  Money that the developer will not
recoup if people trade the library "all over the world" as you put it.

To this end, I am happy to purchase the libraries I use to support brilliant
people in the field like Eric Persing who have given us the most imaginative
and inspiring palettes.  I suggest you do the same.  Now I'm going to open my
Quantum Leap Voices of the Apocalypse set that just showed up.  Which I
bought.  Not traded.

Just a thought...

Kaveh Cohen
Supporter of Sample Developers and Spectrasonics Disciple

Alvaro Villalobos wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Hello Spectrasonics!
>
> Ok then I know!!
>
> I was sure I could buy a Sample CD and sell it if I wanted I didn\ufffdt know I
> had to die with the Sample Cd in my grave!
>
> So what happens if let\ufffds say I bought a CD and want to sell it I can\ufffdt do
> this either??
>
> Or if the worst thing happens for example It gets stolen or I die and
> someone keeps the Sample CD will someone sue my mum and dad????
>
> It seems like you third part developers have big problems then because I\ufffdve
> seen people all over the world trading CD\ufffds and what about all the Mp 3\ufffds
> with samples from Sample Cd\ufffds wich are trade with all the different look a
> like Napster programs aren\ufffdt all those people about 100 million people
> trading sounds and samples illegally??
>
> Sometimes it gets very difficult to know If it\ufffds legal or not at least
> people in the west with internet are not always following the rules and if
> those 100 millions are doing soemthing illegal why aren\ufffdt there people suing
> them are they to many to handle???
>
> Well Spectrasonics please send me a link with laws because it seems a hell
> of a lot easier to get hold of Cd\ufffds than knowing the law!
>
> Merry Xmas,
>
> Alvaro.
>
> >From: PersingEP@...
> >Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> >To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: Re: [exs] EXS 24 sample Cd\ufffds for swop!
> >Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 05:31:33 EST
> >
> >Hi Alvaro,
> >
> >We are a third party developer and you need to know that this is definitely
> >against the law to swap or resell sample libraries. Basically it works this
> >way:
> >
> >The purchase price of a sample library is a single user license to use the
> >samples to use in their music. The license allows the customer to use the
> >samples (our recordings) in their musical recordings. Anyone who hasn't
> >purchased the disc, doesn't have a license to use the sounds and is then
> >using the samples illegally. This risks legal action being taken against
> >both
> >them and their clients....not a good thing at all.
> >
> >The confusion for most people arises because people don't quite grasp that
> >what you are purchasing isn't the phisical disc, as much as the legal right
> >to use the samples.
> >
> >If you would like to research this issue more, I would encourage you to
> >read
> >the Sound Recording Copyright Act, which is much more "black and white"
> >than
> >most people realize.
> >
> >Hope that helps clarify the issue, and why what you are suggesting could
> >get
> >you and anyone else involved in this into a lot of trouble....it's best all
> >the way around to avoid this.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Eric Persing
> >Creative Director
> >Spectrasonics
> >
> >
> >In a message dated 12/18/01 2:05:51 AM, logicuser2001@... writes:
> >
> > >I\ufffdm not to sure I\ufffdve already email you but why do you care??
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Not any third part developers have contacted me and you seem more
> >concerned
> > >
> > >
> > >than them how come??
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Anyway whatever I buy I can trade so there is nothing illegal about
> > >
> > >exchanging something I bought if there is a law saying this is illegal
> > >just
> > >
> > >let me know!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Merry Xmas,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Alvaro.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Kom med i v\ufffdrldens st\ufffdrsta e-posttj\ufffdnst; MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com/sv
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [exs] EXS 24 sample Cd´s for swop!

2001-12-18 by Eli Krantzberg

Kaveh Cohen wrote:

> Many composers and producers would be rendered literally mute were it
> not for indispensable artists like Eric Persing who toil for months on end to
> bring us the most realistic and cutting edge sounds in a small package for much
> less money and time that it would take us to do it ourselves.
>
> [snip]
>
> To this end, I am happy to purchase the libraries I use to support brilliant
> people in the field like Eric Persing who have given us the most imaginative
> and inspiring palettes.  I suggest you do the same.

I must say that this discussion sure hits close to home, for many of us. While I fully
agree with all that you say, there are moral (not legal) ambiguities that exist that
make the issue one small shade lighter than pure black and white for many.

Suppose you run a small modest semi pro home studio. You earn a small portion of your
income from this. Not enough to "quit your day job", but let's say, a few thousand
bucks a year. What percentage of your studio based income do you want to turn around
and re-invest into sample libraries? The more you re-invest, the less profit you end
up with, the further you are a way from increasing your true earning power of your
studio.

One could then say that by owning these libraries you are increasing the earning
potetial of your business. This is true. But a leap of faith is required. Like in any
business, how much do you invest into  your business before realizing the profits you
want to see? What's a realistic balance of investing in sample CDs versus income you
generate from them. And factor into this business descision that many competing with
you have large sample libraries available (not legally aquired).

Now here is where the issue becomes less than black and white. Suppose you have access
to some sample CDs of stuff that is useful to have around, in case you may need them
some day. ie: extra drum loop CDs, ambiance and FX CDs, detailed expensive orchestral
CDs, etc. But you don't use these on a day to day basis, and couldn't possibly justify
the cost of purchasing them all legally based on what you will earn from them, and
because you don't really need/use them regularly. Yet they are handy to have around
for those odd times. And of course let's not forget; fun to play with!

You want to be moral about it and realize the clear legal ambiguities of the different
possible ways of aquiring use of these sounds, but you rationalize it by telling
yourself that you wouldn't be buying these CDs anyway. So having them to play around
and experiment with and maybe even occassionaly use on an income generating project
isn't really costing the sample makers any lost profit because you wouldn't be buying
them anyway. All of a sudden the crime you are committing seems a bit more distant.
You feel removed from it.

Bottom line of course is that we all know that if you aren't paying for them, then you
shouldn't be using them. At all. You don't pay the money, you shouldn't be part of the
party. Anyway, I don't have any real point to get at here; I'm just commenting on the
moral paradigm I see around me all the time; which affects me and that I am required
to function within. And after all is asaid and done, at the end of the day, most
everyone I know finds a way to sleep decently at night.


--
Eli Krantzberg
Nightshift Orchestra / Almat Productions
http://www.nightshiftorchestra.com

Re: [exs] EXS 24 sample Cd´s for swop!

2001-12-18 by Dave Howard

Ok, here's one to fuzz the braid cells even more.

Here in the UK licences to play music recordings in public places, and
places of work are administered by the PRS (Performing Rights Society) who
collect the licence fees and distribute to the copyright holders as
royalties.

I was told by the PRS that the studio I last worked in should have just such
a licence, perhaps understandably because there would be times we would
stick a CD on to listen to whilst we had a break or cleaned (!), but more
interestingly, because without it we couldn't even audition source material
without it.

Dave

-- 
Web Design, Music Composition and Production, Music Technology Training and
MORE!
www.chadales.co.uk

Re: [exs] EXS 24 sample Cd´s for swop!

2001-12-18 by David Tobin

> Ok, here's one to fuzz the braid cells even more.
> 
> Here in the UK licences to play music recordings in public places, and
> places of work are administered by the PRS (Performing Rights Society) who
> collect the licence fees and distribute to the copyright holders as
> royalties.
> 
> I was told by the PRS that the studio I last worked in should have just such
> a licence, perhaps understandably because there would be times we would
> stick a CD on to listen to whilst we had a break or cleaned (!), but more
> interestingly, because without it we couldn't even audition source material
> without it.
> 
> Dave


But even more, this doesn't include the fact that the monies paid to the PRS
don't cover Mechanical copyrights paid to writers as opposed to performers,
and therefore, you really should be paying 2 sets of royalites...
David Tobin

Wow and Flutter music - Arranging, technology, general wellbeing.....

Re: [exs] EXS 24 sample Cd´s for swop!

2001-12-18 by Dave Howard

on 18/12/01 3:05 PM, David Tobin at wowandflutter@... wrote:

> But even more, this doesn't include the fact that the monies paid to the PRS
> don't cover Mechanical copyrights paid to writers as opposed to performers,
> and therefore, you really should be paying 2 sets of royalites...

Aren't MCPS and PRS royalties all dealt with together nowadays?


-- 
Web Design, Music Composition and Production, Music Technology Training and
MORE!
www.chadales.co.uk

Re: [exs] EXS 24 sample Cd´s for swop!

2001-12-18 by David Tobin

> on 18/12/01 3:05 PM, David Tobin at wowandflutter@... wrote:
> 
>> But even more, this doesn't include the fact that the monies paid to the PRS
>> don't cover Mechanical copyrights paid to writers as opposed to performers,
>> and therefore, you really should be paying 2 sets of royalites...
> 
> Aren't MCPS and PRS royalties all dealt with together nowadays?

Not sure - But If anyone knows, I'd like to know....

In the US, ASCAP deals with Performing... Is this right?

Which organisation deals with Mechanical Copyright - Charles something or
other????


David Tobin

Wow and Flutter music - Arranging, technology, general wellbeing.....

Re: [exs] EXS 24 sample Cd´s for swop!

2001-12-21 by Kaveh Cohen

Alvaro, please remember..."crap" as you put it is relative and subjective.
What blows your whistle may in fact be "crap" to someone else and vice versa.
That is why there is always a need for diversity.  Speaking of politics, before
you put forth your opinion, remember that this e-mail list is a public forum
and that many of us work as full time professionals in this industry that you
think "sucks" and that many of the "fucking geeks" and "shitty artists"
developing the sample CD libraries are also members of this post. If you think
that sample CD's are not worth the money, that is your right however it is not
your place to negate the library developers and the industry as a whole simply
because you have an opinion.  Bear in mind that many of us do not hold your
view and are happy to pay for libraries because it contributes to our making
money.  Perhaps if you begin to make money with your productions then you will
see the inherent value.

Kaveh Cohen.


Alvaro Villalobos wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Hello!!
>
> This mail made everything clear!
>
> Even though I don\ufffdt think a lot of the sample CD\ufffds are worth the money.
>
> And I can understand the prices because of hiring people etc etc but
> nowadays you can find million of soundfont files (and samples)over the net
> and a lot of times they sound as good as sample CD\ufffds.
>
> I think the music industry sucks and I wonder if the sample CD industry is
> part of their business??
>
> Also all the people who worked on a sample CD I\ufffdm sure they get paid even if
> the CD doesn\ufffdt sell thousands of copies at least all my friends making
> sounds for different companies they all get paid I can\ufffdt imagine a company
> saying they will get paid when the CD starts selling they get will get paid
> anyway!!
>
> I don\ufffdt want to sound angry with sample Cd companies but sometimes it\ufffds kind
> of weird how a lot of fucking geeks (shitty artists) get paid huge amounts
> for making a sample CD.
>
> But that\ufffds the industry in general isn\ufffdt it??
>
> Look at artists like Britney Spears she makes millions and she is crap what
> about the rest of the world how come they have to suffer because of people
> making to much money inte the western society!
>
> Fucked up politics!!
>
> I wish you a Merry Xmas to you all!!!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alvaro Villalobos.
>
> Ps. Sorry for getting mad with crap artists but sometimes I\ufffdll be watching
> TV and I see people like Oprah wich has som much money and I get pissed!
> Same thing in the music industry!! Ds.
>
> >From: PersingEP@...
> >Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> >To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: Re: [exs] EXS 24 sample Cd\ufffds for swop!
> >Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:37:35 EST
> >
> >Hello to all EXS folks,
> >
> >Here's some answers to your questions and comments:
> >
> >(BTW, All of this information is always printed on the OUTSIDE of our
> >packages, so if you don't like these policy, you can return the disc
> >unopened
> >and get a full refund).
> >
> > >I was sure I could buy a Sample CD and sell it if I wanted I didn\ufffdt know
> > >I had to die with the Sample Cd in my grave!
> >
> >That's basically it. The license is for a single person.
> >
> > >Of course (if I'm informed correctly) you are allowed to sell or give
> >away
> > >your CDs, but again it's obvious to me that after this you aren't allowed
> > >to use the material any longer by yourself.
> >
> >That's incorrect Sascha (see below)
> >
> > >So what happens if let\ufffds say I bought a CD and want to sell it I can\ufffdt
> > >do this either??
> >
> >Correct. For the same reason that you can't "sell" a license of a James
> >Brown
> >recording, even if you bought a license from his record company to use it
> >yourself. You don't own the recordings, so you can't license them or give
> >those rights to someone else.
> >
> > >If I buy a PC game and want to sell it there is nothing illegal about
> >that
> > >so what\ufffds the difference in selling a PC game original or a Sample CD
> > >original??
> >
> >Big difference...you aren't using the game to create a new game. With
> >Sample
> >CDs, you use the recorded material to create your own music recordings.
> >That's why a license is different than a piece of software. (although you
> >should really check the legalities of trading the PC games, different laws
> >apply to software).
> >
> > >Or if the worst thing happens for example It gets stolen or I die and
> > >someone keeps the Sample CD will someone sue my mum and dad????
> >
> >No worries, legal action would be taken against the thief, not your mum &
> >dad!
> >
> > >It seems like you third part developers have big problems then because
> > >I\ufffdve seen people all over the world trading CD\ufffds and what about all the
> >Mp
> >3\ufffds
> > >with samples from Sample Cd\ufffds wich are trade with all the different look
> > >a like Napster programs aren\ufffdt all those people about 100 million people
> >trading sounds and samples illegally??
> >
> >You are correct...this is a major problem for our industry. The changes
> >that
> >have taken place in the last few years are massive. But it is the same old
> >argument that if everyone's doing it, then it must be legal. As Napster
> >will
> >tell you, that just isn't the case.
> >
> > >Sometimes it gets very difficult to know If it\ufffds legal or not at least
> > > people in the west with internet are not always following the rules and
> > >if those 100 millions are doing soemthing illegal why aren\ufffdt there people
> > >suing them are they to many to handle???
> >
> >Certainly, many people do illegal things these days. Lots of lawsuits are
> >happening, but you don't hear about many of them. If you know anyone at a
> >record company, they'll tell you about lots of cases that are going on.
> >
> >It isn't difficult to know the legalities of Sample CD swapping, all of our
> >products come with lots of information in written and audio form explaining
> >what is allowed and what is not. We cannot control if people ignore the
> >laws,
> >but we do go after people who break the law. There exists several
> >organizations that police this activity, and all the developers in the
> >business share info on who's doing what.
> >
> > >Well Spectrasonics please send me a link with laws because it seems a
> >hell
> > >of a lot easier to get hold of Cd\ufffds than knowing the law!
> >
> >Check out the Sound Recording Copyright Act from the US Copyright office.
> >
> > >One question pops up though:
> > >Let's assume I'm doing a remix and there's one single loop in the
> >material
> > >I'm getting, coming from a commercial sample CD. In order to use that
> >single
> > >loop in the remix, will I have to buy the complete CD just because of
> >that?
> >
> >If the original artist has a license, then you are OK to use it only for
> >the
> >remix. If not, you could have legal problems...especially if your remix
> >becomes popular.
> >
> > >The way I'm doing it now is that I streem all tracks from bar 1 to the
> > >end of the song. That doesn't give away the samples, but it gives away
> >the
> >way _I_ used the samples.
> > >I also write on the tracks sheet what samples cd's where used. Nobody
> >could
> >tell me if this is the legal way to do it though...
> > >Maybe somebody from Spectrasonic would comment on this?
> >
> >This is an excellent way of solving the problem -it respects our samples,
> >and
> >allows you to deliver the project to the label. Great!
> >
> > >When someone decided to create a samples CD, he absolutely knows that the
> > >CD can be copied ( of course, or he is from a planet called QWERTY !)...
> > >If I bought a CD I can do what I want with... give it to someone, make
> > >a present, put it in the trash or whatever...
> >
> >It is also very easy to go over the speed limit when you are driving a car,
> >but it doesn't mean that you won't get a ticket! Of course we know that it
> >is
> >easy to copy, but that doesn't mean that we don't care about it, and that
> >we
> >don't prosecute people that abuse the law.
> >
> > >So if I buy the permission I can\ufffdt sell it??
> > >How can Michael Jackson the buy all the Beatles permissions??
> >
> >It cost over $100 million as I remember.
> >
> > >But I still want an answer If I have an original sample CD can\ufffdt I change
> > >it with someone else who bought an original sample CD???
> >
> >No you can't.
> >
> > >Like you said I buy the permission but I must be able to sell my
> >permission
> > >somehow if I want or??
> >
> >That's what a "non-transferrable, single-user" license means.
> >
> > >You want to be moral about it and realize the clear legal ambiguities of
> > >the different
> > >possible ways of aquiring use of these sounds, but you rationalize it by
> > >telling
> > >yourself that you wouldn't be buying these CDs anyway. So having them to
> > >play around
> > >and experiment with and maybe even occassionaly use on an income
> >generating
> > >project
> > >isn't really costing the sample makers any lost profit because you
> >wouldn't
> > >be buying
> > >them anyway. All of a sudden the crime you are committing seems a bit
> >more
> > >distant.
> > >You feel removed from it.
> > >
> > >Bottom line of course is that we all know that if you aren't paying for
> > >them, then you
> > >shouldn't be using them. At all. You don't pay the money, you shouldn't
> > >be part of the
> > >party. Anyway, I don't have any real point to get at here; I'm just
> >commenting
> > >on the
> > >moral paradigm I see around me all the time; which affects me and that
> > >I am required
> > >to function within. And after all is asaid and done, at the end of the
> > >day, most everyone I know finds a way to sleep decently at night.
> >
> >Rationalization is a beautiful thing!
> >
> >:-)
> >
> >However, obviously you have to draw the line. It isn't a "victimless"
> >crime.
> >Illegal copying, trading and piracy radically affects my family and the
> >musicians who are involved in our projects (they receive royalties from the
> >sales), does that make it easier for you to do the right thing?
> >
> >As this forum regularly points out, there are lots of free and legal
> >alternatives for sounds. They're usually not as good as commercial
> >libraries,
> >but you get what you pay for. You don't HAVE to use illegally pirated
> >libraries to make a music business for yourself.
> >
> > >What if your not professional and not using it on a pro job, but only
> >using
> >it
> > >for your own personal non professional projects? And based on the cost
> > >to profit ratio you wouldn't normally buy these CDs.  Of course it is
> >still
> > >illegal, but is the crime then as "bad"?
> >
> >It would be inconsistent for us to allow non-pros to use our samples on an
> >unlimited basis, while pros had to pay. It would be impossible to track,
> >since many bedroom productions now go on to be major hits. We have to keep
> >it
> >simple.
> >
> > >If u'r not professionnal, I mean u don't earn money with u'r music, u can
> > >do what u want !
> > >I don't know any report of any TRIAL against any kind of user.
> >
> >That's really bad advice. Individual, non-pro users get in trouble for
> >illegal copying and trading all the time. Just because you don't know about
> >it, doesn't mean that it doesn't happen regularly. Most people that have
> >illegal discs will get in trouble over it, it's usually just a matter of
> >when.
> >
> > >Did those companies invest in research to find a solution to not be able
> > >to copy Cd ? ...no...
> >
> >Yael, you are way off base here. You don't know what any of these companies
> >are doing. If you read the news, you'll see that these days every
> >intellectual property owner who is distributing on CDs/DVDs is working on
> >non-copyable CD technology. It is a huge hassle for everyone, but it is
> >necessary.
> >
> > >it's not a Money problem, even 1 $ ... when u win money u can buy those
> > >Cd,
> > >
> > >if it's an hobby u can do what u want...
> >
> >Your opinion, but not the law.
> >
> > >Here in the UK licences to play music recordings in public places, and
> > >places of work are administered by the PRS (Performing Rights Society)
> > >who collect the licence fees and distribute to the copyright holders as
> > >royalties.
> >
> >PRS, ACAP and BMI are organizations that license the performance of
> >compositions (songwriting). This area of Copyright Law is wholly separate
> >from the Sound Recording copyright. As such, our samples are not covered
> >under any agreements with any of these organizations. You have to buy the
> >disc (license) from an authorized Spectrasonics dealer or distributor.
> >
> > >Maybe we could have a group purchase of a studio and a set of horn
> >players,
> > >and share all the sounds together via rocket!!!!!!!!
> >
> >I would highly recommend this experiment. Everyone involved will have a new
> >appreciation of what is involved to produce a usable patch. Brass in
> >particular is insanely hard.
> >
> >Whew! Long post......hope that helps clarify some of these issues.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Eric Persing
> >Creative Director
> >Spectrasonics
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Eric Persing
> >Spectrasonics
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> H\ufffdmta MSN Explorer kostnadsfritt p\ufffd http://explorer.msn.se/intl.asp
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.