Yahoo Groups archive
Thread
2002-02-10 by iamme3at
Is anyone doing this successfully? I've got quite a collection of CD's for my ASR10 that I'd like to use in the EXS24. What issues is the with this conversion? Thanks for the help. Lance Lasky Miracle Creations
2002-02-10 by Rubber Chicken Software Co.
At 01:16 AM 2/10/02 +0000, you wrote: >Is anyone doing this successfully? >I've got quite a collection of CD's for my ASR10 that I'd like to use >in the EXS24. >What issues is the with this conversion? 1. The EXS parameters are not as deep a level as the parameters in the Ensoniq. In other words, the filter envelopes, the LFO parameters, and others, are on the Instrument level in EXS, whereas on the Ensoniq, you can set these aprameters for every wave, if desired. 2. The Ensoniq usually adds some of it's built-in effects on some sounds, and of course these don't carry over. 3. Ensoniq sounds are usually well programmed and have deep usability. It's not easy to get this all across. 4. Ensoniq envelopes are 5 stage; the EXS only has ADSR's. Other than that, they work quite well. Garth Hjelte Sampler User
2002-02-10 by HELP@MusicBootCamp.com
I've done a great deal of this kind of conversion. I highly recommend Translator by Rubber Chicken (http://www.chickensys.com/). They do a very through job in converting the ASR elements and have been working with Ensoniq samplers for years. -Jer
> From: "iamme3at" <llasky@...> > Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 01:16:57 -0000 > To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [exs] Converting Ensoniq to EXS > > Is anyone doing this successfully? > I've got quite a collection of CD's for my ASR10 that I'd like to use > in the EXS24. > > What issues is the with this conversion? > > Thanks for the help. > > Lance Lasky > Miracle Creations > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
2002-02-10 by Nadav Ravid
I wonder - How does translator treats EPS/ASR bi-directional loops? does it automatically turn them into regular loops, or does it add the backwards loop portion to the actual wave data? and what about loop+release? I really miss these two features in the EXS :( At 09:49 10/02/02 +0000, you wrote:
>Message: 12 > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 00:17:35 -0500 > From: <HELP@...> >Subject: Re: Converting Ensoniq to EXS > >I've done a great deal of this kind of conversion. I highly recommend >Translator by Rubber Chicken (http://www.chickensys.com/). They do a very >through job in converting the ASR elements and have been working with >Ensoniq samplers for years. -Jer
2002-02-10 by Rubber Chicken Software Co.
At 03:50 PM 2/10/02 +0200, you wrote: >I wonder - >How does translator treats EPS/ASR bi-directional loops? >does it automatically turn them into regular loops, or does it add the >backwards loop portion to the actual wave data? Both. =) This is featured in Roland and Kurzweil translations too, as they implement bi-directional and related different looping schemes. >and what about loop+release? Nada; no way to simulate this in the EXS (HALion can, though). No big - hardly implemented. Garth Hjelte Sampler User
2002-02-10 by Lasky
Add this comment from Rubber Chicken on the EXS mail list. A list you may want to join... people share their own samples here and seems to only be productive posts about the EXS. You will need a yahoo account. (It's free to sign up.) To join the EXS list go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exs-users/ Lance
-----Original Message-----
From: Rubber Chicken Software Co. [mailto:support@...]
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 8:10 PM
To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [exs] Converting Ensoniq to EXS
At 01:16 AM 2/10/02 +0000, you wrote:
>Is anyone doing this successfully?
>I've got quite a collection of CD's for my ASR10 that I'd like to use
>in the EXS24.
>What issues is the with this conversion?
1. The EXS parameters are not as deep a level as the parameters in the
Ensoniq. In other words, the filter envelopes, the LFO parameters, and
others, are on the Instrument level in EXS, whereas on the Ensoniq, you
can
set these aprameters for every wave, if desired.
2. The Ensoniq usually adds some of it's built-in effects on some sounds,
and of course these don't carry over.
3. Ensoniq sounds are usually well programmed and have deep usability.
It's
not easy to get this all across.
4. Ensoniq envelopes are 5 stage; the EXS only has ADSR's.
Other than that, they work quite well.
Garth Hjelte
Sampler User
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]2002-02-10 by Lasky
Sorry this was to go off list.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lasky [mailto:llasky@...]
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 8:29 AM
To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [exs] Converting Ensoniq to EXS
Add this comment from Rubber Chicken on the EXS mail list.
A list you may want to join... people share their own samples here and
seems
to only be productive posts about the EXS.
You will need a yahoo account. (It's free to sign up.)
To join the EXS list go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exs-users/
Lance
-----Original Message-----
From: Rubber Chicken Software Co. [mailto:support@...]
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 8:10 PM
To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [exs] Converting Ensoniq to EXS
At 01:16 AM 2/10/02 +0000, you wrote:
>Is anyone doing this successfully?
>I've got quite a collection of CD's for my ASR10 that I'd like to use
>in the EXS24.
>What issues is the with this conversion?
1. The EXS parameters are not as deep a level as the parameters in the
Ensoniq. In other words, the filter envelopes, the LFO parameters, and
others, are on the Instrument level in EXS, whereas on the Ensoniq, you
can
set these aprameters for every wave, if desired.
2. The Ensoniq usually adds some of it's built-in effects on some
sounds,
and of course these don't carry over.
3. Ensoniq sounds are usually well programmed and have deep usability.
It's
not easy to get this all across.
4. Ensoniq envelopes are 5 stage; the EXS only has ADSR's.
Other than that, they work quite well.
Garth Hjelte
Sampler User
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
exs-users-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]