Re: CDXtract vs Translator
2002-04-17 by Bernard Chavonnet
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 02:22:01 -0500 > From: <HELP@...> > Subject: Re: Converting software...... CDXtract vs Translator > > 1) Your conclusions are correct. Go for the AKAI > 2) Translator does a superior job converting SoundFonts. As far as I know, > only Translator converts the modulation and filter data. For most drums, you > can use the EXS24's own SoundFont importer, but for any other kind of > filter-dependent patch like synths, etc., you better go for Translator. That's not true, CDXtract converts modulation and filter data as well. Even the LFO speed is converted very accurately. Translator is a fantastic tool but the fact that its price is almost twice the price of CDXtract doesn't mean that it's 2 times better. If you are looking for a conversion software, see which one you prefer by downloading the 2 demos. Both products are used by thousands of users wordwide so they must be mature enough. Bernard Another sampler user