EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Thread

Re: [exs] [OT]EXS, plug-ins and CPU consumption

Re: [exs] [OT]EXS, plug-ins and CPU consumption

2002-05-15 by Sascha Franck

Rapha\ufffdl TIDAS wrote:
> Can we enjoy songs with 24 exs24
> inserted, 48 audio tracks with vst plug ins inserted, plus emagic plug ins
> etc... Without stepping into TDM's world ?

I don't know - to me it seems that for truly complexed stuff it's still good
to have some hardware (or TDM for that matter) FX around, especially when it
comes to reverbs and compressors.
Right now I am using an Athlon 1gHz and while it's almost sufficient for
complete native mixes when dealing with audio only, I manage to max it out
easily when using VSTis (especially things such as the ES2). And of course
there's still no high quality native reverb for some tasks.
Personally I am thinking about either getting one of those DSP cards
(Powercore or UAD-1) or a new external unit for reverbs only. I seem to get
some reasonable results for small rooms and ambiences out of TrueVerb, RVerb
and FreeVerb2, but as soon as I want some more prominent reverb I wouldn't
know what to use but an external unit.

Anyways, here's some (rough) performance figures based on my system:
- 180 EXS voices without filter.
- 90 voices with filter.
- 250+ B4 voices (yeah, that thing is damn efficient)
- 27 audiotracks, 12 Fat EQs, 2 RenEQ 4band, 2 RenEQ 2band, 3 RenVox, 3
Compressors, 1 Endorphin (MB compressor), 2 RenVerbs, 1 StereoDelay, 1
TapeDelay, around 5-6 B4 voices, around 5-6 EVP88 voices, around 10
(unfiltered) EXS voices. That's what I used for a recent mix and Logic was
behaving pretty well. Of course all those weren't allways playing at one
time.

An even more rough figure from a friends system I recently worked with (an
Athlon 2000+):
- 350+ EXS voices without filter.
- around 220 EXS voices with filter (very rough estimation, had no time to
check more properly).
-  40+ audiotracks (loads of choire tracks and vocal snipplets), Fat or
Ren2band EQ on at least half of them, at least 10 RenVox, at least 10
compressors, *some* RenComps,  lots of delays (stereo and tape, at least
4-5), 3-4 RenVerbs, some Endorphins, at least 50 EXS voices (don't remember
which were filtered and which weren't), one ES2 (playing like around 2-3
voices of a 3 OSC, 2 filter patch), some EVP voices (a basic chord track)
and some other things (Ensemble, Phaser, Tremolo etc.) I don't exactly
remember... as said, that's just a very rough estimation, but it all went
fine and we didn't have to even think about inbetween bounces a single time,
actually we haven't even been watching the CPU meter, we were just working.
Oh well, that was all in 16bit.

My impression is that right now it should allready be possible to run a full
16bit mix natively in case you don't do 100% native synth stuff and in case
you have (or don't need) a better solution for compressors and reverbs.
I would say that in 1-3 years from now (of course you never know what sort
of performance boost those new 64bit CPUs and OS's will bring) you won't
need that much external stuff any longer - assuming that sound quality of
both VSTis and FX is increasing as well, but we're allready seeing that with
things such as Absynth, FM7 and the ES2. And of course assuming there's
further instruments finally coping up with Virusses, Nordleads and the likes
(if you need those at all, that is).

Regards,
Sascha

Re: [exs] [OT]EXS, plug-ins and CPU consumption

2002-05-15 by Raphaƫl TIDAS

Thank you very much for this answer, that gives me an accurate idea of
performances...
:-)

Raphael
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I don't know - to me it seems that for truly complexed stuff it's still good
> to have some hardware (or TDM for that matter) FX around, especially when it
> comes to reverbs and compressors.
> Right now I am using an Athlon 1gHz and while it's almost sufficient for
> complete native mixes when dealing with audio only, I manage to max it out
> easily when using VSTis (especially things such as the ES2). And of course
> there's still no high quality native reverb for some tasks.
> Personally I am thinking about either getting one of those DSP cards
> (Powercore or UAD-1) or a new external unit for reverbs only. I seem to get
> some reasonable results for small rooms and ambiences out of TrueVerb, RVerb
> and FreeVerb2, but as soon as I want some more prominent reverb I wouldn't
> know what to use but an external unit.
> 
> Anyways, here's some (rough) performance figures based on my system:
> - 180 EXS voices without filter.
> - 90 voices with filter.
> - 250+ B4 voices (yeah, that thing is damn efficient)
> - 27 audiotracks, 12 Fat EQs, 2 RenEQ 4band, 2 RenEQ 2band, 3 RenVox, 3
> Compressors, 1 Endorphin (MB compressor), 2 RenVerbs, 1 StereoDelay, 1
> TapeDelay, around 5-6 B4 voices, around 5-6 EVP88 voices, around 10
> (unfiltered) EXS voices. That's what I used for a recent mix and Logic was
> behaving pretty well. Of course all those weren't allways playing at one
> time.
> 
> An even more rough figure from a friends system I recently worked with (an
> Athlon 2000+):
> - 350+ EXS voices without filter.
> - around 220 EXS voices with filter (very rough estimation, had no time to
> check more properly).
> -  40+ audiotracks (loads of choire tracks and vocal snipplets), Fat or
> Ren2band EQ on at least half of them, at least 10 RenVox, at least 10
> compressors, *some* RenComps,  lots of delays (stereo and tape, at least
> 4-5), 3-4 RenVerbs, some Endorphins, at least 50 EXS voices (don't remember
> which were filtered and which weren't), one ES2 (playing like around 2-3
> voices of a 3 OSC, 2 filter patch), some EVP voices (a basic chord track)
> and some other things (Ensemble, Phaser, Tremolo etc.) I don't exactly
> remember... as said, that's just a very rough estimation, but it all went
> fine and we didn't have to even think about inbetween bounces a single time,
> actually we haven't even been watching the CPU meter, we were just working.
> Oh well, that was all in 16bit.
> 
> My impression is that right now it should allready be possible to run a full
> 16bit mix natively in case you don't do 100% native synth stuff and in case
> you have (or don't need) a better solution for compressors and reverbs.
> I would say that in 1-3 years from now (of course you never know what sort
> of performance boost those new 64bit CPUs and OS's will bring) you won't
> need that much external stuff any longer - assuming that sound quality of
> both VSTis and FX is increasing as well, but we're allready seeing that with
> things such as Absynth, FM7 and the ES2. And of course assuming there's
> further instruments finally coping up with Virusses, Nordleads and the likes
> (if you need those at all, that is).
> 
> Regards,
> Sascha

Re: [exs] [OT]EXS, plug-ins and CPU consumption

2002-05-15 by HELP@MusicBootCamp.com

> (Powercore or UAD-1) or a new external unit for reverbs only

The UAD reverb is superior to TC's. It also has better compressors. One
caveat though is that Emagic has announced plans to engineer some of its
plugins to run off Powercore. My advice? Buy both (hee, hee)!

--------------------
Jer Olsen, CEO
MusicBootCamp.com

"We give musicians the edge!"

http://MusicBootCamp.com/
Phone: 301-962-9509
HELP@...

Re: [exs] [OT]EXS, plug-ins and CPU consumption

2002-05-16 by jddymackbn@aol.com

I use lots of plugins, and lots of Virtual insts. including EXS24, with my 
dual-Gig G4. I find that the pull is on my audio and not on my processor. The 
dual can handel it fine, but my MOTU828 is crashing in certain points of the 
song. I also have a UA card which I cant wait to use, but cant, because it 
doesn't support Dual processing yet. When it does, I don't think I will 
continue to have this problem.

Try checking your metering to see if it is your CPU that is failing or you 
Audio!?

Good luck,
J-trying to build the perfect digstudio around logic!

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.