EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

I finally got around to trying the 
"Logic/helper/IO-muted-2nd-processor" trick, but I don't notice any 
change whatsoever in the system performance meter when I try this.  I 
tried it on a processor-killing timpani patch in EXS24, and placed 
before an instance of Waves Ren. Reverb on a bus.  No change with or 
without it.  Has anyone noticed a change with virtual instruments using 
this technique?

--- In exs-users@yahoogroups.com, "the noise" <itsthenoise@h...> wrote:
 > first up forgive me if everyone knows about this... I read this on the
 > Sound-on-Sound forum and thought everyone who's got a dual processor 
should
 > know as it sounds like it could majorly increase the power of your 
computer.

On Sunday, April 20, 2003, at 06:21 PM, exs-users@yahoogroups.com wrote:

> turbo charged logic...I don't notice any difference!
>
> I finally got around to trying the
> "Logic/helper/IO-muted-2nd-processor" trick, but I don't notice any
> change whatsoever in the system performance meter when I try this.  I
> tried it on a processor-killing timpani patch in EXS24, and placed
> before an instance of Waves Ren. Reverb on a bus.  No change with or
> without it.  Has anyone noticed a change with virtual instruments using
> this technique?
>

Did you put a valid in and output in the I/O plugin? You could also try 
puting the I/O plugin on the tracks that are actually sending to the 
bus instead. Or create an input object of an unused input and put a 
bypassed send there. The send  should be to the bus where you have your 
reverb.

Martin Karlegård
Songwriter and Producer
http://www.kbrosmusic.com

You have to designate in input and output, even though they aren't used when
the plugin is deactivated. -Jer

> I finally got around to trying the
> "Logic/helper/IO-muted-2nd-processor" trick, but I don't notice any
> change whatsoever in the system performance meter when I try this.  I
> tried it on a processor-killing timpani patch in EXS24, and placed
> before an instance of Waves Ren. Reverb on a bus.  No change with or
> without it.  Has anyone noticed a change with virtual instruments using
> this technique?

Actually, probably works with just the output set. UAD-1 instructions said
both, but setting the output only has worked for me, as mentioned by another
list member in answer to the question. -Jer

> You have to designate in input and output, even though they aren't used when
> the plugin is deactivated. -Jer

As I understand it, this technique does not work for soft-synth 
plug-ins; Emagic or otherwise.
I've noticed increased performance with WAVES and Emagic FX Plug-ins.
No change with EXS24, ES2, ES1 or EVOC20
On Sunday, Apr 20, 2003, at 11:21 America/Indianapolis, 
exs-users@yahoogroups.com wrote:

>  Re: OT: turbo charged logic...I don't notice any difference!
--
Charles Shriner

MCSD Studio
http://www.mcsdstudio.com

Elemental Media
http://www.elementalmedia.net