Damn, that sucks. Never would've thought that'd make a difference. Thanks for thinking of this and putting it to the test. I'll really have to think now of what I can do --- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, Marko Menart <okramtranem@...> wrote: > > I did a little experiment. I created an algorithm and put three Stereo Flangers > in a row (57 RAM, 210 CPU). According to the manual there's only 18 CPU blocks > left (plus about 28 extra blocks), but I still managed to fit in a Smooth Wah > which requires 25 CPU!!! > > Then I created an algorithm and put three Stereo Phasers in a row (6 RAM, 204 > CPU). According to manual there's only 24 CPU blocks left. > > Now here comes the best part: With 24 CPU blocks left I could easily fit in a > Cabinet Emulator (0 RAM, 17 CPU) but couldn't fit 6x2 Mixer (0 Ram, 17 CPU) or > even 1 Band Parametric EQ (0 Ram, 14 CPU)! > > To conclude: It seems that the max values of RAM and CPU depends on the type and > (or) combination of modules used in an algorhitm. The chart in the manual can > serve only as a basis for pre-designing algorhitms. The final values are up to > GSP. > > > Best regards, Marko >
Message
Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?
2010-07-08 by Steven Vachon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.