Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Message

Re: [gsp-2101] Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?

2010-07-08 by Marko Menart

What kind of sound (result) are you up to? And also do you have a PPC 210 
installed?

Best regards, Marko





________________________________
From: Steven Vachon <prometh@...>
To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, July 8, 2010 3:13:08 PM
Subject: [gsp-2101] Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?

  
Damn, that sucks. Never would've thought that'd make a difference. Thanks for 
thinking of this and putting it to the test. I'll really have to think now of 
what I can do

--- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, Marko Menart <okramtranem@...> wrote:
>
> I did a little experiment. I created an algorithm and put three Stereo Flangers 
>
> in a row (57 RAM, 210 CPU). According to the manual there's only 18 CPU blocks 

> left (plus about 28 extra blocks), but I still managed to fit in a Smooth Wah 
> which requires 25 CPU!!!
> 
> Then I created an algorithm and put three Stereo Phasers in a row (6 RAM,  204 

> CPU). According to manual there's only 24 CPU blocks left.
> 
> Now here comes the best part: With 24 CPU blocks left I could easily fit in a 
> Cabinet Emulator (0 RAM, 17 CPU) but couldn't fit 6x2 Mixer (0 Ram, 17 CPU) or 

> even 1 Band Parametric EQ (0 Ram, 14 CPU)!
> 
> To conclude: It seems that the max values of RAM and CPU depends on the type 
>and 
>
> (or) combination of modules used in an algorhitm. The chart in the manual can 
> serve only as a basis for pre-designing algorhitms. The final values are up to 

> GSP.
> 
> 
> Best regards, Marko
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.