Mailist to discuss all issues regarding the Digitech GSP-2101 Guitar FX Processor

A reverbed digital delay, with a phaser applied over top of it all at the end. I have this with a flanger and sounds good, but the phaser's giving some trouble

And yes, I have the second disc... I have a limited edition model. However, I prefer to use the extra power for seamless patch switching

--- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, Marko Menart <okramtranem@...> wrote:
>
> What kind of sound (result) are you up to? And also do you have a PPC 210 
> installed?
> 
> Best regards, Marko
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Steven Vachon <prometh@...>
> To: gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thu, July 8, 2010 3:13:08 PM
> Subject: [gsp-2101] Re: Flanger fits but not Phaser?
> 
>   
> Damn, that sucks. Never would've thought that'd make a difference. Thanks for 
> thinking of this and putting it to the test. I'll really have to think now of 
> what I can do
> 
> --- In gsp-2101@yahoogroups.com, Marko Menart <okramtranem@> wrote:
> >
> > I did a little experiment. I created an algorithm and put three Stereo Flangers 
> >
> > in a row (57 RAM, 210 CPU). According to the manual there's only 18 CPU blocks 
> 
> > left (plus about 28 extra blocks), but I still managed to fit in a Smooth Wah 
> > which requires 25 CPU!!!
> > 
> > Then I created an algorithm and put three Stereo Phasers in a row (6 RAM,  204 
> 
> > CPU). According to manual there's only 24 CPU blocks left.
> > 
> > Now here comes the best part: With 24 CPU blocks left I could easily fit in a 
> > Cabinet Emulator (0 RAM, 17 CPU) but couldn't fit 6x2 Mixer (0 Ram, 17 CPU) or 
> 
> > even 1 Band Parametric EQ (0 Ram, 14 CPU)!
> > 
> > To conclude: It seems that the max values of RAM and CPU depends on the type 
> >and 
> >
> > (or) combination of modules used in an algorhitm. The chart in the manual can 
> > serve only as a basis for pre-designing algorhitms. The final values are up to 
> 
> > GSP.
> > 
> > 
> > Best regards, Marko
> >
>