Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Message

Attacking the Taliban vs terrorism( was: Re: [L-OT] OT^2 - Thanks)

2001-10-11 by yoonchinet@yahoo.com

--- In logic-ot@y..., "Wilson Zorn" <wilson.zorn@a...> wrote:
> > Yoonchi.
> > Ps I'm sorry that the American president made a stupid move by attacking a
> country just for political reasons, not for the purpose to fight terrorism.
> >
> 
> I'm sorry you don't get it.  Pardon me, but what the heck do you think we're
> attacking?  We're attacking the Taliban and terrorist strongholds.  

This is exactly what I mean. The focus was first to attack terrorism. Now it has shifted to military action against the Taliban and terrorism seems to come in second place. The political view is being attacked while at first there was a campaign started to fight terrorism.
It's beside the point that I don't support the Taliban views. 

> Yes, I realize civilians will get hurt.  I wish that were impossible.

It is possible to realize certain goals without having to start a war or without casualties. The only difference is IMO that it takes longer. And for political reasons it isn't popular to have a campaign running for long periods of time.
Yoonchi.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.