Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Message

Re: [L-OT] No Moderation

2002-10-21 by Jeremy Martin

--- In logic-ot@y..., Dennis Gunn <dennisg@a...> wrote:
> >The only non-political posts I rejected were from Dennis Gunn, just
> >calling me "disgusting" more or less, in many different ways - I
> >wanted to take that conversation up with him privately as I didn't
> >really feel like it belonged on the list. Didn't realize anyone 
> >would miss that, but since you insist, I won't spare you all from 
> >it any longer ..
> 
> Good.  Because the above statement is demonstrably false.  Here is 
> the first of my posts Jeremy censored in it's mistyped entirety.

Unfortunately there is no record of rejected messages, and I didn't 
recall this post. "Thank you" for pointing it out. :P 
 
> >Unless there are two beta tester groups this is simply untrue.  In 
> >the one *I* belong to the political threads flair up and die down 
> >on their own and the emagic employees let them live and die their 
> >natural lives.  In the one *I* some posts were moved to another 
> >folder when then thread had gotten long but by that point the 
> >conversation had died on it's own and emagic had nothing to do 
> >with it.
> >
> >I miss Joeri.  I am outta here.
> 
> Could you show me the line in there where I called Jeremy 
> disgusting?

"I miss Joeri.  I am outta here." equates to the same thing.   
 
> Here is a post where I did use the word "disgusting" but I did not 
> say he was disgusting I said I was disgusted with him and 
> disappointed with Joeri.  The thing about disappointment is that 
> you have to like or respect the person in the first place for it to 
> happen that's why it was possible for me to be dissapointed with 
> Joeri:

My god you're good at being mean :-) 
 
> >Joeri writes:
> >
> >>Wow, I haven't read the OT list in a while, but I agree... this
> >>might be waaaaay OT, even for the OT list.
> >
> >I could not be more disappointed in you or disgusted with Jeremy.
> 
> I would not bore any of you with any of this but it basically just 
> irks the hell out of me read someone knowingly spreading falsities 
> (there is a word for that) and then censoring the truth.

I'm sorry, but I wasn't "knowingly spreading falsities". 

And yes, I am very proud to be a censor:

cen·sor 

2 : one who supervises conduct and morals: as a : an official who 
examines materials (as publications or films) for objectionable 
matter b : an official (as in time of war) who reads communications 
(as letters) and deletes material considered sensitive or harmful

3 : a hypothetical psychic agency that represses unacceptable notions 
before they reach consciousness
 
Jeremy

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.