dg, hey! re: the teuffel tesla: >I don't know about the exact one you play teslas. >but the ones on that site >though they are all very beautiful look uncomfortable to play for >someone like myself who is accustomed to resting his forearm across >top of a strat or tele. the tesla is much more balanced than any guitar i've used, except for the klein electrics; the body-design is, in fact, very ergonomic. plenty of forearm-resting room, there..... much more than a strat/lespaul/etc. >I once thought I would able to get used to >not doing that and made my own short bodied headless. It turned out >that it never was as comfortable to me as a plain old strat. to each their own, eh? but: ya might wanna judge the tesla (better) by trying one..... >I >think the original strat design was one of the greatest bits of >industrial art of the 20th century both for it's sexy lines and >stripped down functionality. me, too. (i still have one, though i never play it. and a '65 mustang, etc). that, however, does definitely not (in my experience) preclude the inevitable development of guitar-design..... in which i remain remarkably interested and supportive of those luthiers (ned steinberger, steve klein, ulli teuffel, andreas, etc) who pursue that evolution. best, dt / splattercell
Message
Re: [L-OT] q for splattercell
2002-10-22 by texture444@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.