The Logic Off Topic list

zeek duff wrote:
> Well "moderators," I sure don't know how you're going to 
decide what's 
> "related to music" and what isn't.  As far as I'm concerned, 
everything 
> in life is "related to music."  Or, "Music is life, the rest is 
> details."  

right on rainbow brother

>  We just 
> had the American Congress give our "President" 
unprecedented power to 
> make a preemptive strike on another sovereign nation, while 
our economy 
> is in shambles, partly because people are more concerned 
with an 
> impending "war" than creating work, or creating anything, for 
that 
> matter.  Then, we find out that another country, North Korea, 
has had 
> nukes in the oven for some time and our "President" knew that 
a full 2 
> weeks before Congress voted to give him his requested, 
unprecedented 
> "power."  A secret his administration kept until after the vote, 
events 
> certainly worthy of at least a 3 chord Folk Song, recorded in 
Logic 
> Audio Platinum.

are you suggesting that our "moderators" have a secret agenda 
they aren't telling us about? how dramatic! nice way to sneek 
politics in without being deleted.  ; )

>But, find all this on yet another 
> list?  Not worth the effort.  Jeremy notes we have 608 LUGgers 
on this 
> list and I'll note that only 27 of them voted in the last poll.  I'd 
say 
> that indicates an overwhelming majority who don't give a fat 
rat's ass 
> WHAT is discussed on this list, by a margin of 596 to 12.  


Even the US public has a higher voting ratio! At least the yahoo 
voting machine works and the ballot is understandable.

>The ratio of 
> LUG on topic subscribers to LUG-OT subscribers suggests 
that this is the 
> only list needed to preserve the interest of those who have  
"related" 
> interests beyond the actual care and feeding of Logic Audio, 
itself.  At 
> 608 to 9265, I'm shown that less than 1/10th of the Logic 
Users know 
> about this list or care about it and how it relates to their craft.  I 
> could construe that imbalance as due to people who don't vote 
or don't 
> care about anything else, but that would be as silly as 
assuming 12 
> people should "legitimately" decide what 596 others discuss.
> 
> The rest of this discussion has been about personal 
idiosyncrasies, and 
> is the most irrelevant discussion of all.  I care more about what 
> someone thinks than how they express it or their opinion of 
how someone 
> else expressed theirs, idiot, asshole, or "nice guy."  So, skip 
the 
> bullshit, forget the insults, they aren't REALLY personal 
because no one 
> REALLY knows anyone else here, and get on with the 
"debates," whatever 
> the "topic." 
> 
> Regards,
> ...z

thank you Zeek for your words of wisdom.

teddybut