Yahoo Groups archive

The Logic Off Topic list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Message

Re: [L-OT] Hot Damn, Emu's site beats Emagic's

2001-06-11 by SBS.TBleicher@t-online.de

Sascha Franck schrieb:
> Actually companies should offer some plain text site in addition, install a
> counter and see which site will be visited more often.

Hi Sascha,

well, you even do not need a plain text site ;) to make loading fast and
convenient. Mostly, when I do webdesign for my customers (Banking companies,
communities etc.) it is necessary to view all(!) results with at least three
or four different browsers and check all results. Furthermore, I do not
use (currently) flash etc. because this is nice for the first time, but
bothers people if it\ufffds still there after the 3rd time ;)

> As far as Emagics site goes I'm sure that after your first experience the 
> "design" version will get no hits at all.

Personally I like the design of the site, BUT: This site could be easily made
without using any proprietary code etc. and it definitely would function
the same on IE and Netscape.

> Don't get me wrong, I love nice webdesign, but from companies such as Emagic
> I want information and slick design, that's all.

IMO there always should be a balance between a "nice-looking" and
"fast-loading" site, as well as the compliance to all necessary browser
platforms. Personally I know a lot of sites that even won\ufffdt load if you
have javascript disabled or no flash installed. Well, there are my
"one-visit-wonders" :)

Bye
Thomas

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.