The Logic Off Topic list

Why are we still being moderated if we are not continuing the
Israel/Palestine topic? wasn't that the reason for the moderation?

teddybut

PS. there some new interesting polls for your consideration

--- In logic-ot@y..., teddybut <teddybut@e...> wrote:
> Why are we still being moderated if we are not continuing the
> Israel/Palestine topic? wasn't that the reason for the moderation?


That's a good point. I'll unmoderate the list now. However you personally will remain moderated as less than 24 hours ago you posted more than 7 direct personal attacks which I had to reject.  

Cheers
Jeremy

--- In logic-ot@y..., teddybut <teddybut@e...> wrote:
> PS. there some new interesting polls for your consideration

This is only one of the 5 Emagic lists I am the head admin of, and I 
would like to remind you that I have no obligation to let you continue 
your memberships. So far I have been able to resist banning you but I'm 
not sure how much longer I'll be able to if you continue with your jokes. 
I have no reason to take this shit from you and I can't think of a faster 
way to put an end to it. And no, I'm not thinking of banning you because 
of your opinion about the "censorship" issue, but because of your personal 
insults to me and to others. I don't want to have to ban you, but I 
gladly will if you continue to make insults. Feel free to write 
whatever you want about the moderating issues but further insults 
will not be tolerated. This is your warning.

Take it easy. 
Jeremy

> --- In logic-ot@y..., teddybut <teddybut@e...> wrote:
>> Why are we still being moderated if we are not continuing the
>> Israel/Palestine topic? wasn't that the reason for the moderation?
> 
"Jeremy Martin" <sadus@...> wrote:

> That's a good point. I'll unmoderate the list now. However you personally will
> remain moderated as less than 24 hours ago you posted more than 7 direct
> personal attacks which I had to reject.
> 
> Cheers
> Jeremy

thank you, thank you, oh great one.

see it's a lot of work for you to moderate this insanity. why bother?

those personal attacks were only meant to make to make you realize how
futile this crusade of your's is. And how much work it would be for you if I
acted like a "retart" all the time and you had to constantly moderate me. of
course I did not succeed in changing your mind. of course, you also deleted
the only message where I obeyed your "rule"... sigh

teddybut

> --- In logic-ot@y..., teddybut <teddybut@e...> wrote:
>> PS. there some new interesting polls for your consideration

"Jeremy Martin" <sadus@...>  wrote:

> This is only one of the 5 Emagic lists I am the head admin of, and I
> would like to remind you that I have no obligation to let you continue
> your memberships. So far I have been able to resist banning you but I'm
> not sure how much longer I'll be able to if you continue with your jokes.
> I have no reason to take this shit from you and I can't think of a faster
> way to put an end to it. And no, I'm not thinking of banning you because
> of your opinion about the "censorship" issue, but because of your personal
> insults to me and to others. I don't want to have to ban you, but I
> gladly will if you continue to make insults. Feel free to write
> whatever you want about the moderating issues but further insults
> will not be tolerated. This is your warning.
> 
> Take it easy. 
> Jeremy

thanks for the warning. I appreciate you not banning me without one. I will
cease and desist with my attacks on you and others.

teddybut

--- In logic-ot@y..., teddybut <teddybut@e...> wrote:
> those personal attacks were only meant to make to make you realize 
> how futile this crusade of your's is. And how much work it would be 
> for you if I acted like a "retart" all the time and you had to 
> constantly moderate me. of course I did not succeed in changing 
> your mind. of course, you also deleted the only message where I 
> obeyed your "rule"... sigh


Hmm, I know you mentioned before you thought the last one was "ok", 
but they all seemed like very close variations on the same theme and 
it didn't seem like even the last one was a non-personal-attack. Do 
you mind reposting the last one again and I'll take a closer look at 
it? 

Thanks
Jeremy

> Hmm, I know you mentioned before you thought the last one 
was "ok", 
> but they all seemed like very close variations on the same 
theme and 
> it didn't seem like even the last one was a non-personal-attack. 
Do 
> you mind reposting the last one again and I'll take a closer look 
at 
> it? 
> 
> Thanks
> Jeremy

not worth my time anymore to go back and help you unmoderate 
me, sorry. It was a test. I didn't think you'd actually read them all 
as they were so similar (except the last one).

teddybut