Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: MMC DOS FAT16 filesystem source available --> GPL implications

2005-11-18 by rtstofer

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, 42Bastian Schick <bastian42@m...> 
wrote:
>
> Micron Engineering <micronpn@t...> schrieb am Thu, 17 Nov 2005 
22:54:55
> 
> > You really think that lawyers may see our source code? Yes ok if 
they
> > pay we may show it to them but if they can't say with absolute 
security
> > that you have infringed some patents or licenses they can't and 
in
> > embedded world (solid state flash to be more precise) is 
impossible to
> > recognize a part of object code as a part of source code 
illegally used.
> 
> It is not impossible. Every compiler has a certain foodprint and 
if I know
> my code I can compare it.
> If it is something very common like FATFS, it is maybe hard esp. 
as there
> aren't millions of ways to do it.
> But _I_ won't rely on the matter that a lawyer is not smart enough 
to trap
> me.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 42Bastian Schick
>

The usual way these things get going is a disgruntled former 
employee.  There is no need for forensic science to dismantle the 
chip or even a clever lawyer.  The DFE simply turns over a printed 
or machine readable copy of the code.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.