--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "lpc2100_fan" <lpc2100_fan@...> wrote: > > > > > Hi Leon, > > > > > > the newer versions with fast I/O can not toggle as fast as the > > > instruction rate, true, but half as fast! So you can get a pin > > > toggled every other clock cycle resulting in a possible output > > > frequency of e.g. 60/4 = 15. > > > > > > I happen to know that many people compare this to the AVR ;-) You > > > would need a 30 MHz AVR to do this. > > > > > > Bob > > > > > Newer AVRs can toggle a pin in 1 cycle ;-) Aren't comparisons > > wonderful. > > > > Jim > > > Hello Jim, > > exactly what I wrote. To get a frequency of 60/4 you need to toggle > TWICE in 4 clocks. If you tell me that a 16 MHz AVR can generate more > than 8 MHz output that would really be news to me because that would > be 2 instructions in one cycle, a superscalar AVR8. > > Please no offense, I think it was only a misunderstanding in wording. > And still the ARM needs 2 cycles to toggle a pin while the AVR does it > in one, it's just a fact that the ARM can almost run four cycles > before the AVR is done with one. > > The only reason I am comparing this to the AVR because the older > devices which needed 8 cycles to toggle a pin were actually slower in > toggeling than a 16 MHz AVR and that has been a major complaint in > this forum back then. > > Bob > Hello Bob, No offense taken, I simply, as you say, misunderstood what you meant. Anyway it's good to see that newer LPCs can produce some reasonable I/ O toggle rates, something that put me off them at first. Jim
Message
Re: ARM Thruput expectations
2006-03-22 by jrweekes52
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.