Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: 2103 forces dual supply?

2006-04-25 by rtstofer

--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Robert Wood <robert.wood@...> wrote:
>
>  >> Closer inspection reveals to me that the Minimum Voltage for the 
> VccIO and VccA pins on the 2103 is 3.0V.  How disappointing - a tiny 
> chip and I have to run a split supply just to get it to boot?  Anyone 
> done the unthinkable and tried to run the whole works off of 1.8V?  And 
> here I wanted to replace all my 8-bit uC's with the 2103 ever
after... <<
> 
> The other thing that puts me off using the 210x rather than, say, AVRs 
> is the fact that you only have one 32 bit port. I'd much rather use an 
> ATMega that has multiple ports. Too much bit shifting going on with the 
> ARM for me.
>

I certainly like the ATmega128 but it isn't even close in speed to the
LPC2106.  It doesn't have as much SRAM either.

The ARM7TDMI-S has a 32 bit barrel shifter.  I don't think shifting
things around is much of an issue.

One downside of the 32 bit instruction (ARM mode) is that it chews up
the 128k bytes in a hurry.  The other side is that many instructions
are conditional so small branches aren't required.

There's good and bad in every device.  It's always a question when I
start a new project; which device to use.  I like the 5V inteface
levels of the AVR, I like the speed of the LPC, I think I would really
like the LPC2138 with the A/D converter and single supply, if I have
the pins left over I like using Rowley CrossConnect to do JTAG on the
LPC but I'm ok with ISP for either device and the LPC has more SRAM. 
Always choices...

Richard

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.