--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, Robert Wood <robert.wood@...> wrote: > > >> Closer inspection reveals to me that the Minimum Voltage for the > VccIO and VccA pins on the 2103 is 3.0V. How disappointing - a tiny > chip and I have to run a split supply just to get it to boot? Anyone > done the unthinkable and tried to run the whole works off of 1.8V? And > here I wanted to replace all my 8-bit uC's with the 2103 ever after... << > > The other thing that puts me off using the 210x rather than, say, AVRs > is the fact that you only have one 32 bit port. I'd much rather use an > ATMega that has multiple ports. Too much bit shifting going on with the > ARM for me. > I certainly like the ATmega128 but it isn't even close in speed to the LPC2106. It doesn't have as much SRAM either. The ARM7TDMI-S has a 32 bit barrel shifter. I don't think shifting things around is much of an issue. One downside of the 32 bit instruction (ARM mode) is that it chews up the 128k bytes in a hurry. The other side is that many instructions are conditional so small branches aren't required. There's good and bad in every device. It's always a question when I start a new project; which device to use. I like the 5V inteface levels of the AVR, I like the speed of the LPC, I think I would really like the LPC2138 with the A/D converter and single supply, if I have the pins left over I like using Rowley CrossConnect to do JTAG on the LPC but I'm ok with ISP for either device and the LPC has more SRAM. Always choices... Richard
Message
Re: 2103 forces dual supply?
2006-04-25 by rtstofer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.