On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 09:50:33PM -0400, James Dabbs wrote: > On low pin count devices, should you ever revisit the concept of a > "secondary JTAG port," reserve a pin that selects the JTAG port at > reset. Alternatively, make the port with the ETM module the secondary > port, since this is the one that's more difficult to fit into most > designs. Enabling (what usually amounts to) the main JTAG interface in > software is too fragile for such a debug mechanism. Why does it need to be a JTAG port - with no possibility for boundary scans (on a controller you can use firmware to do the scan) the JTAG port can replaced by a single pin. M.
Message
Re: [lpc2000] New Poll started with Wish-List for future devices
2004-06-18 by Matthias Weingart