Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: [lpc2000] Re: New Poll started with Wish-List for future devices

2004-06-18 by Matthias Weingart

On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 03:12:32AM -0000, javaguy11111 wrote:
> How about a chip with less flash, but more sram. Keep enough onboard
> flash read from a serial flash device to load the sram. Or maybe drop
> the flash altogether and just automatically boot from a flash device
> that implements SPI or I2C.

SRAM - static RAM - is expensive - at least 6 times more space is needed as
for flash. I think this is the reason for the little RAM on available uC's.
But DRAM is as small as Flash - I dont know why we see no DRAM in
controllers. The additional power consumption (for refresh) is little
higher; static operation is only required for deep sleep mode, probably
process reasons?

        Matthias

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.