Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: [lpc2000] Re: Revision B or C?

2004-09-14 by Leon Heller

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Butcher" <mjbcswitzerland@...>
To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:40 PM
Subject: [lpc2000] Re: Revision B or C?


> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "leon_heller" <leon_heller@h...> wrote:
>> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "acetoel" <acetoel@y...> wrote:
>> > Hello...I have received 10 LPC2106 from philips and I would like to
>> > know if this chips are the famous revision B which has several
>> > problem...I think so...the chips says LPC2106B C00709 TPN0042 5C
>> > What do I have to do to prevent the error of the flash in the B
>> > series?
>>
>> http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/acrobat/erratasheets/2106.pdf
>>
>> Leon
>
> Now I'm confused. I had a chip sort of distroy itself during ISP
> upload. Its marking is from 0418 (week 18 2004) and then 8C (Rev. C).
> According to the errata, chips manufactured before week 19 2004 are
> affected. Does this means that also C-Rev. are affected??? Or only B
> before week 19. Are there B and C from week 18 and is the problem I
> encoutered due to the this or something else?

I read it as saying that no Rev. C chips are affected. I suppose there could 
be both B and C chips from week 18, it's probably the date they were 
packaged and marked. Perhaps someone from Philips could confirm this.

Leon
--
Leon Heller, G1HSM
http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.