Rev C is not affected. Philips Apps. --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Leon Heller" <leon_heller@h...> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Butcher" <mjbcswitzerland@y...> > To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:40 PM > Subject: [lpc2000] Re: Revision B or C? > > > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "leon_heller" <leon_heller@h...> wrote: > >> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "acetoel" <acetoel@y...> wrote: > >> > Hello...I have received 10 LPC2106 from philips and I would like to > >> > know if this chips are the famous revision B which has several > >> > problem...I think so...the chips says LPC2106B C00709 TPN0042 5C > >> > What do I have to do to prevent the error of the flash in the B > >> > series? > >> > >> http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/acrobat/erratasheets/2106.pdf > >> > >> Leon > > > > Now I'm confused. I had a chip sort of distroy itself during ISP > > upload. Its marking is from 0418 (week 18 2004) and then 8C (Rev. C). > > According to the errata, chips manufactured before week 19 2004 are > > affected. Does this means that also C-Rev. are affected??? Or only B > > before week 19. Are there B and C from week 18 and is the problem I > > encoutered due to the this or something else? > > I read it as saying that no Rev. C chips are affected. I suppose there could > be both B and C chips from week 18, it's probably the date they were > packaged and marked. Perhaps someone from Philips could confirm this. > > Leon > -- > Leon Heller, G1HSM > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
Message
Re: Revision B or C?
2004-09-14 by philips_apps
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.