Yahoo Groups archive
Thread
2004-09-10 by acetoel
Hello...I have received 10 LPC2106 from philips and I would like to know if this chips are the famous revision B which has several problem...I think so...the chips says LPC2106B C00709 TPN0042 5C What do I have to do to prevent the error of the flash in the B series? Thanks Ezequiel P.D.: I'm looking for TiniARM_dev_eclipse.pdf which was a schematic of a dev board...thanks
2004-09-11 by Uwe Arends
Ezequiel, > P.D.: I'm looking for TiniARM_dev_eclipse.pdf which was a schematic > of a dev board...thanks as for your PS: http://www.newmicros.com/download/appnotes/ARM/TiniARM_Dev_Eclipse.pdf although this doesn't deal with schematics of dev. boards but rather with how to setup an ARM development environment using Eclispe, Cygwin and GNUArm. One schematic may be found here: http://www.newmicros.com/store/product_schematics_pdf/TiniARM.pdf hth -uwe
2004-09-12 by leon_heller
--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "acetoel" <acetoel@y...> wrote: > Hello...I have received 10 LPC2106 from philips and I would like to > know if this chips are the famous revision B which has several > problem...I think so...the chips says LPC2106B C00709 TPN0042 5C > What do I have to do to prevent the error of the flash in the B > series? http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/acrobat/erratasheets/2106.pdf Leon
2004-09-13 by g2100g
As described in the errata sheet, the revision is the last letter in the third line, so it looks like rev C to me. --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "acetoel" <acetoel@y...> wrote:
> Hello...I have received 10 LPC2106 from philips and I would like to > know if this chips are the famous revision B which has several > problem...I think so...the chips says LPC2106B C00709 TPN0042 5C > What do I have to do to prevent the error of the flash in the B > series? > Thanks > Ezequiel > > P.D.: I'm looking for TiniARM_dev_eclipse.pdf which was a schematic > of a dev board...thanks
2004-09-14 by Mark Butcher
--- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "leon_heller" <leon_heller@h...> wrote: > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "acetoel" <acetoel@y...> wrote: > > Hello...I have received 10 LPC2106 from philips and I would like to > > know if this chips are the famous revision B which has several > > problem...I think so...the chips says LPC2106B C00709 TPN0042 5C > > What do I have to do to prevent the error of the flash in the B > > series? > > http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/acrobat/erratasheets/2106.pdf > > Leon Now I'm confused. I had a chip sort of distroy itself during ISP upload. Its marking is from 0418 (week 18 2004) and then 8C (Rev. C). According to the errata, chips manufactured before week 19 2004 are affected. Does this means that also C-Rev. are affected??? Or only B before week 19. Are there B and C from week 18 and is the problem I encoutered due to the this or something else? Cheers Mark Butcher
2004-09-14 by Leon Heller
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Butcher" <mjbcswitzerland@...> To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:40 PM Subject: [lpc2000] Re: Revision B or C? > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "leon_heller" <leon_heller@h...> wrote: >> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "acetoel" <acetoel@y...> wrote: >> > Hello...I have received 10 LPC2106 from philips and I would like to >> > know if this chips are the famous revision B which has several >> > problem...I think so...the chips says LPC2106B C00709 TPN0042 5C >> > What do I have to do to prevent the error of the flash in the B >> > series? >> >> http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/acrobat/erratasheets/2106.pdf >> >> Leon > > Now I'm confused. I had a chip sort of distroy itself during ISP > upload. Its marking is from 0418 (week 18 2004) and then 8C (Rev. C). > According to the errata, chips manufactured before week 19 2004 are > affected. Does this means that also C-Rev. are affected??? Or only B > before week 19. Are there B and C from week 18 and is the problem I > encoutered due to the this or something else? I read it as saying that no Rev. C chips are affected. I suppose there could be both B and C chips from week 18, it's probably the date they were packaged and marked. Perhaps someone from Philips could confirm this. Leon -- Leon Heller, G1HSM http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
2004-09-14 by philips_apps
Rev C is not affected. Philips Apps. --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Leon Heller" <leon_heller@h...> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Butcher" <mjbcswitzerland@y...> > To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:40 PM > Subject: [lpc2000] Re: Revision B or C? > > > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "leon_heller" <leon_heller@h...> wrote: > >> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "acetoel" <acetoel@y...> wrote: > >> > Hello...I have received 10 LPC2106 from philips and I would like to > >> > know if this chips are the famous revision B which has several > >> > problem...I think so...the chips says LPC2106B C00709 TPN0042 5C > >> > What do I have to do to prevent the error of the flash in the B > >> > series? > >> > >> http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/acrobat/erratasheets/2106.pdf > >> > >> Leon > > > > Now I'm confused. I had a chip sort of distroy itself during ISP > > upload. Its marking is from 0418 (week 18 2004) and then 8C (Rev. C). > > According to the errata, chips manufactured before week 19 2004 are > > affected. Does this means that also C-Rev. are affected??? Or only B > > before week 19. Are there B and C from week 18 and is the problem I > > encoutered due to the this or something else? > > I read it as saying that no Rev. C chips are affected. I suppose there could > be both B and C chips from week 18, it's probably the date they were > packaged and marked. Perhaps someone from Philips could confirm this.
> > Leon > -- > Leon Heller, G1HSM > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
2004-09-14 by g2100g
There are two different issues here. One is a problem in the mask of the chip itself, which Philips says was fixed in chip rev C. The other is a problem with the bootloader code. This is not directly related to chip rev. To fix this problem, bootloader code in the chip must be upgraded to version 1.52 or higher, as described in the errata sheet. According to Philips, all chips with date code 0419 or later already have this bootloader code. If your chips are from 0418, they probably need their bootloader code updated, even if they are rev C. --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "Leon Heller" <leon_heller@h...> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Butcher" <mjbcswitzerland@y...> > To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:40 PM > Subject: [lpc2000] Re: Revision B or C? > > > > --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "leon_heller" <leon_heller@h...> wrote: > >> --- In lpc2000@yahoogroups.com, "acetoel" <acetoel@y...> wrote: > >> > Hello...I have received 10 LPC2106 from philips and I would like to > >> > know if this chips are the famous revision B which has several > >> > problem...I think so...the chips says LPC2106B C00709 TPN0042 5C > >> > What do I have to do to prevent the error of the flash in the B > >> > series? > >> > >> http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/acrobat/erratasheets/2106.pdf > >> > >> Leon > > > > Now I'm confused. I had a chip sort of distroy itself during ISP > > upload. Its marking is from 0418 (week 18 2004) and then 8C (Rev. C). > > According to the errata, chips manufactured before week 19 2004 are > > affected. Does this means that also C-Rev. are affected??? Or only B > > before week 19. Are there B and C from week 18 and is the problem I > > encoutered due to the this or something else? > > I read it as saying that no Rev. C chips are affected. I suppose there could > be both B and C chips from week 18, it's probably the date they were > packaged and marked. Perhaps someone from Philips could confirm this.
> > Leon > -- > Leon Heller, G1HSM > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller