----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Jakacki" <peterjak@...> To: <lpc2000@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 9:49 PM Subject: Re: [lpc2000] Re: port timing > > Update frequency is not the same as output frequency when toggling. If > you turn the outputs on and off at an update rate of 7.4MHz you will end > up with a output frequency of 3.7MHz. > > I run my 2106 at 22.1184MHz (overclocked) x3 and achieve an update > frequency of ~8.3MHz or update period of 120ns on the GPIO pins. This is > reading from RAM and writing shifted data. Toggling the pins would only > give me a ~4.15MHz signal. > > Philips might wonder how important is I/O speed really, what's all the > gripe about. I'd say it isn't important, -except- for embedded real-time > control. Now which market did Philips intend these chips for? > > With the 2106 I generate 192x480x8 VGA graphics over 640x480 60Hz timing > without any extra hardware other than some resistors. I really wish > Philips would listen and improve the GPIO interface, how hard can it > really be??? Surely it would have to be THE simplest fix. > > *Peter* > You are right, I did mean an update frequency. Now, how can you generate video graphics with this frequency if pixel clock is 70nS (ntsc, and even less for pal) ? That's about what I am trying to accomplish, and I am really lost. Gennady
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: port timing
2005-04-11 by Gennady Palitsky
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.