At 11:49 AM 4/11/05 +1000, Peter Jakacki wrote: >Philips might wonder how important is I/O speed really, what's all the >gripe about. I'd say it isn't important, -except- for embedded real-time >control. Now which market did Philips intend these chips for? Well I do embedded real-time control and pin toggling speed is not of great importance for what I do. Different problem areas have different constraints. I would expect that in some real-time embedded environments that the capability to do high rate pin toggling would be seen as a reason for caution since high toggling rates may imply fast edge rates with all the implications that those have. I don't think Philips was expecting people to do a lot of high rate bit-banging with these chips, but high-rate bit-banging and embedded real-time are two different, but not exclusive, markets. You can have either one without the other. Robert " 'Freedom' has no meaning of itself. There are always restrictions, be they legal, genetic, or physical. If you don't believe me, try to chew a radio signal. " -- Kelvin Throop, III http://www.aeolusdevelopment.com/
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: port timing
2005-04-11 by Robert Adsett
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.