Rick <rfarmer@...> schrieb am Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:48:25 -0700: > I was pleased to see the announcement of the 2101/2/3. What it means to > me is that there is little reason to use an 8-bitter in a new design any > more. I've been watching the ARM uC field develop for the last few years > I've recently decided that the LPC2xxx will do nicely as my next > bread-n-butter processor. However, on the low end the need for an > external 1.8V regulator, external reset, and clock add another buck to I'd like to see a Philips application note, about the simplest way to build such a system. E.g. no 1.8V regulator but just a voltage divider (not sure if this is the right term). > the BOM. If you look at the low end 8-pin AVRs and PICs 8-bitters they > have all three built in. IMHO, that's half of their charm. IHMO also, uC cost is not everything. I guess most of the design out there are still 5V TTL designs. -- 42Bastian Schick
Message
Re: [lpc2000] Re: LPC2101/02/03 - OTHER VERSIONS PLANNED WITH MORE FLASH ?
2005-09-27 by 42Bastian Schick
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.