Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Thread

newbie question

newbie question

2005-11-23 by Deepak Kashyap

Hello fellow members,
  This is my first post.I am new to lpc and starting off with lpc2124.
  I want to know what are the Free ( gnu) tools available for  LPC2124 for win deelopment preferably.
  
  Also I have worked on RTos' s before can freeRTos be ported to any custom hardware design?
  
  
  Thank you 
  
  Deepak


		
---------------------------------
 Enjoy this Diwali with Y! India Click here

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [lpc2000] newbie question

2005-11-23 by Charles Manning

On Wednesday 23 November 2005 15:30, Deepak Kashyap wrote:
> Hello fellow members,
>   This is my first post.I am new to lpc and starting off with lpc2124.
>   I want to know what are the Free ( gnu) tools available for  LPC2124 for
> win deelopment preferably.

www.gnuarm.org has prebuilt gnu toolchains. I would recommend gcc 3.4.3 or so.

I would strongly recommend using cygwin as a gnu environment under Windows 
rather than vanilla windows. cygwin gives proper gnu make etc.

>
>   Also I have worked on RTos' s before can freeRTos be ported to any custom
> hardware design?

Yes. AFAIK there are already ports of FreeRTOS to gcc for various ARM micro 
variants.

Re: [lpc2000] newbie question

2005-11-23 by FreeRTOS Info

> www.gnuarm.org has prebuilt gnu toolchains. I would recommend gcc 3.4.3 or
so.
>
> I would strongly recommend using cygwin as a gnu environment under Windows
> rather than vanilla windows. cygwin gives proper gnu make etc.


I use the gnuarm tools along with UnxUtils
(http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/) rather than the cygwin make.

Regards,
Richard.


http://www.FreeRTOS.org

Re: [lpc2000] newbie question

2005-11-23 by Charles Manning

On Wednesday 23 November 2005 21:12, FreeRTOS Info wrote:
> > www.gnuarm.org has prebuilt gnu toolchains. I would recommend gcc 3.4.3
> > or
>
> so.
>
> > I would strongly recommend using cygwin as a gnu environment under
> > Windows rather than vanilla windows. cygwin gives proper gnu make etc.
>
> I use the gnuarm tools along with UnxUtils
> (http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/) rather than the cygwin make.

UnxUtils looks interesting as a Cygwin alternative. I'll give it a try. From 
what I read it supports sed etc too which are typically quite important in 
more complex makefiles.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.