Re: [milter-greylist] cutting off sender-string
2004-09-08 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, it s planned for some day. Feel free to submit a patch for it. ... Not yet. Any suggestion? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le
Messages
Browse messages
Page 136 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
RE: [milter-greylist] cutting off sender-string
2004-09-08 by attila.bruncsak@itu.int
Hello, Dynamic memory allocation would be cleaner. No need to have magic numbers hardcoded. In my greylist.conf there are 5477 subscriber at this moment,
Re: [milter-greylist] cutting off sender-string
2004-09-07 by manu@netbsd.org
... True, you need to bump this as well, else the dump reload won t work as expected. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui
Re: [milter-greylist] cutting off sender-string
2004-09-07 by jothev
... I m a newbie here, but looking at the code it appears that the printf statements (when dumping to greylist.db) use a hardcoded %32s , so you probably
Re: [milter-greylist] cutting off sender-string
2004-09-07 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... You can use a regex. ... Sure: bump ADDRLEN in dump.h and rebuild. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] cutting off sender-string
2004-09-07 by Matthias Scheler
... That s a known feature . ... Change ADDRLEN in dump.h to 65 and rebuild. Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler
cutting off sender-string
2004-09-07 by hans hm04
hi all i am using milter-greylist ver 1.5.6 it seems that the senders address is cutting off after 30 characters. so some rules defined in
Re: [milter-greylist] sendmail.mc setup
2004-09-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... No idea, I don t use macros, I use the kit Jussieu (excellent sendmail.cf preprocessor, but the documentation is only in french) ... I won t add it to
Re: [milter-greylist] sendmail.mc setup
2004-09-06 by Jack L. Stone
... I found I had to comment out the use of milter-greylist macros because I had errors with them. The Sendmail-8.12.11 seemed to have everything needed for
Re: [milter-greylist] sendmail.mc setup
2004-09-06 by manu@netbsd.org
... I think you re right. Note that you don t need verify if you don t use SMTP authentication to whitelist the sender. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de
Re: [milter-greylist] sendmail.mc setup
2004-09-06 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu The other lines specify which sendmail macro should be made visible to manu milter-greylist. If you remove them, you loose the queue id display
Re: [milter-greylist] sendmail.mc setup
2004-09-05 by manu@netbsd.org
... The other lines specify which sendmail macro should be made visible to milter-greylist. If you remove them, you loose the queue id display in the logs, the
Re: [milter-greylist] sendmail.mc setup
2004-09-05 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... antispamz For those of you who build your .cf from a .mc file with m4, you must antispamz define: antispamz define(`_FFR_MILTER , `1 )dnl. Then,
Re: [milter-greylist] sendmail.mc setup
2004-09-05 by javier wilson
... INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`greylist , `S=local:/var/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock )dnl define(`confMILTER_MACROS_CONNECT , `j, {if_addr} )dnl
sendmail.mc setup
2004-09-05 by antispamz
Hi, New to the list. Not having used a milter before, I could only get it to work with sendmail.cf, except the greylist part got trashed any time I updated
Re: [milter-greylist] Empty DB file
2004-09-05 by Jeff Forbes
drwxr-xr-x 2 smmsp smmsp 4096 Sep 4 20:09 . drwxr-xr-x 32 root root 4096 Aug 24 22:39 .. -rw------- 1 smmsp root 0
Re: [milter-greylist] Empty DB file
2004-09-04 by manu@netbsd.org
... Does milter-greylist has the write permission on the file? What version is it (run milter-greylist -r) -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes
Empty DB file
2004-09-03 by Jeff Forbes
I recently installed milter-greylist on two machines and it works well on both, except that on one machine the database dumpfile is being touched every ten
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: FreeBSD install from pkg; is it running? -- yes, now
2004-08-31 by Graham Dunn
... INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`milter-greylist , `S=local:/var/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock, T=S:4m;R:4m )dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`mimedefang ,
Re: FreeBSD install from pkg; is it running? -- yes, now
2004-08-31 by William F. Dudley Jr.
To follow up with the answer to my own post: You need to have a line like this: define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS , `greylist,clmilter )dnl in your sendmail.mc
Re: [milter-greylist] FreeBSD install from pkg; is it running?
2004-08-30 by William F. Dudley Jr.
Thanks! I ve done it. I ll let you know if I learn something interesting. Bill Dudley
Re: [milter-greylist] FreeBSD install from pkg; is it running?
2004-08-30 by Jack L. Stone
... `S=local:/var/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock ) ... --local --outgoing --max-children=50 /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock ...
FreeBSD install from pkg; is it running?
2004-08-30 by William F. Dudley Jr.
Hi, I installed milter-greylist 1.5.6 from the FreeBSD package. System is: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE. Added to /etc/rc.conf: miltergreylist_enable= YES
Milter-Greylist died in action
2004-08-24 by Jack L. Stone
Good morning list: I was surprised this morning to see that milter-greylist had died earlier. Spamassassin had also died (which has ocurred before) so I don t
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-22 by Jack L. Stone
... FYI.... here is my milter-sendmail build/install on FBSD-4.10-p2/Sendmail-8.12.11 http://www.sage-american.com/tmp/milter-sender.txt First, I had to update
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-22 by Matthias Scheler
... The good news is that at least NetBSD-current uses the thread safe BIND 9 resolver out of the box. Kind regards -- Matthias Scheler
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-22 by manu@netbsd.org
... The rule is simple: do DNS resolutions with a thread-unsafe resolver in a milter and you crash. Now you just have to make a list of thread-unsafe resolvers
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-22 by milter@free.fr
... = Anthony has given some answers on this topic. ... = Right. Everybody using Milter applications on BSD distros faced such problems one day. I know many
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-22 by manu@netbsd.org
Jack L. Stone wrote: [milter-sender] ... Did you linked against a thread-safe resolver (ie: BIND 9.x libbind.a)? I don t know about
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, I did the NetBSD port once, and it was so badly broken I lose interest and did not upgrade it. So you think I should give it another try? I suspect it
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-21 by Jack L. Stone
... load on ... ever ... 0.58) ... I ve tried both 0.58 and 0.60 without luck.... Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator Sage American
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-21 by milter@free.fr
... Emmanuel, Jack, Which versions did you use ? Did you report it to Anthony (milter-sender s author) ? I CC him as I know he s pretty active and might help
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-21 by Jack L. Stone
... Hi, Emmanuel: Interesting! Milter-sender core dumps on me too every time & I ve tried it numerous times over the past 6 months or so -- more than one
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... That makes me think: anyone uses a sender callback system? I tried milter-sender but it quickly crashed on my system, so I was considering rewriting one
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-21 by manu@netbsd.org
... No, I m still there (though I ll go offline for a week soon). It s just that developpement of milter-greylist has quite setteled since it does everything I
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-21 by Jack L. Stone
... Hi: Thanks for the reply! I was worried because I do enjoy this list and this particular milter (plus milter-regex) has really relieved the load on
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-21 by milter@free.fr
Hi Jack, ... August means vacations ... I guess that Manu and the other milter-greylist users enjoy real-life a bit.... I really long for a new stable
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-21 by Jack L. Stone
... No more emails for a week+.... have I been unsubscribed...??? Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator Sage American http://www.sage-american.com
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-11 by manu@netbsd.org
... Proably not, especially since it does not use any of the functions listed below. Do you still have the warnings if you replace -lc_r by -pthread? ... --
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-10 by Jack L. Stone
....update: actually I DO have those things not found on the system. Noted the milter binary is still dated Aug 3..... ... -lc_r -lmilter ... mkstemp() ...
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-10 by Jack L. Stone
... I got these warnings when compiling milter-rcptfilter-0.9. Is is fatal?: (running FBSD-4.10Rp2/Sendmail-8.12.11) gcc -o milter-rcptfilter conf.o except.o
Long delays reported in log file
2004-08-10 by Scot L. Harris
I am hoping someone can confirm the following. Using version 1.4 of milter-greylist. In the log files I see milter-greylist marking messages with header lines
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-10 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... It would be even better to enable multiple use of syncaddr so that one can bind to several addresses, either IPv4 or IPv6. This means introducing a chained
1.5.6 packaging problem, erratum
2004-08-10 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... Oh, yes, I screwed up things when packaging. I just updated the tarball, the new MD5 sum is MD5 (milter-greylist-1.5.6.tgz) =
Re: [milter-greylist] release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-10 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu milter-greylist-1.5.6 is now available. It seems there is a problem in composing. There is unwanted milter-greylist-1.5.6/milter-greylist
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Working with multiple MX
2004-08-10 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... That sounds right. Except of course if your mX forward mail to an inner mailhost where the user s mailboxes are. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
release: milter-greylist-1.5.6 and milter-rcptfilter-0.9
2004-08-10 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Hi milter-greylist-1.5.6 is now available. It introduces the long awaited patch from Cyril Guibourg that enable MX sync local address selection. Next versions
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Working with multiple MX
2004-08-10 by leloup
... correct, but the *last* Received is written by *your* mailserver, so this shouldnt be forged ;-) But I see the point: of course milter-greylist can t read
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Working with multiple MX
2004-08-10 by manu@netbsd.org
... In my opinion, the secondary MX is not worth it anymore. It enable the mail to be queued longer on a single machine (which means less load when the primary
RE: [milter-greylist] Re: Working with multiple MX
2004-08-10 by Johnny Sletteland
Is a secondary MX really needed in a normal scenario where your primary has a fairly constant link to the internet? All MTAs with respect for themselves will