Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Working with multiple MX
2004-08-09 by leloup
... won t help, because you only can tell the server from whom you get the mail, to retry sending it again. And that is your secondary mx in this case...
Messages
Browse messages
Page 137 of 144 · 7199 messages matched
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: Working with multiple MX
2004-08-09 by manu@netbsd.org
Javier wrote: [No authentication for MX sync] ... it will only accept connexions from hosts you have listed as peer in your config file. Of
Re: [milter-greylist] hotmail fails to retry?
2004-08-09 by Jack L. Stone
... No, have not whitelisted them..... Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator Sage American http://www.sage-american.com jacks@sage-american.com
Re: Working with multiple MX
2004-08-09 by Javier
... isn t that a bit insecure? in the sense that you are sharing your greylist database with anyone who uses you as peer? or you have to choose that IP as your
Re: [milter-greylist] Working with multiple MX
2004-08-09 by Cyril Guibourg
... not really, peers know about others and accept updates from others thru TCP. ... for greylist sync between two milters, there is no notion of primary or
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: hotmail fails to retry? (solved)
2004-08-09 by leloup
... yeah, I also noticed, that hotmail always chooses the second MX. Funny... ... nope. It just takes the last (i.e. first ;-) Received-line. So it will put
Working with multiple MX
2004-08-09 by Javier
... i am planning on changing my secondary MX server to a linux platform. in the README file it says something about using peer in the config file so that MX
Re: [milter-greylist] Re: hotmail fails to retry? (solved)
2004-08-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... No, it won t. You need to whitelist your secondary MX. All the mail that gets in the secondary will always go to the primary, that s just a matter of time.
Re: hotmail fails to retry? (solved)
2004-08-09 by Javier
hello, i am sorry, it was my mistake, it turns out that we have misconfigured seconday MX severs that uses rockliffe mailsite (windows). i didn t notice this
Re: [milter-greylist] hotmail fails to retry?
2004-08-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... And you haven t whitelisted hotmail.com? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux qui ne le
Re: [milter-greylist] hotmail fails to retry?
2004-08-09 by Jack L. Stone
... We have hundreds of tech magazine subscribers that use hotmail -- no problem here. Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator Sage American
Re: [milter-greylist] hotmail fails to retry?
2004-08-09 by manu@netbsd.org
... Whitelist the whole mailfarm. There is no point into greylisting messages that come from a legitimate MTA: whether they are spam or not, they will pass
Re: hotmail fails to retry?
2004-08-09 by Javier
are you using the same version of milter-greylist i am using (1.5.5)? this is my sendmail configuration: INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`greylist ,
RE: [milter-greylist] hotmail fails to retry?
2004-08-09 by Johnny Sletteland
It seems to work fine for me. The email gets delayed and retried and passes. My retry is set to 3 minutes. -Johnny
hotmail fails to retry?
2004-08-09 by Javier
hello, i just installed milter-greylist 1.5.5 on a linux machine with sendmail 8.12.11 i have try sending mails from yahoo and hotmail, everything works fine
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist scalibility/performances : 10.000 to 20.000 email addresses
2004-08-04 by Cyril Guibourg
... Since he plan to mxsync 4 servers that may be built on different architectures I thought that 1.5.3 was a decent choice ;)
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.5
2004-08-04 by Christian Pelissier
... Successfull clean build of 1.5.5 on Solaris 9 Sparc and Solaris 9 X86. Launched on Solaris 9 X86 but not yet tested. -- Christian Pélissier Office
milter-greylist-1.5.5
2004-08-03 by manu@netbsd.org
Third software release in a row: milter-greylist-1.5.5. That one was quite urgent because the ABI clash in Linux is nasty: you end up with a dump you can t
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist scalibility/performances : 10.000 to 20.000 email addresses
2004-08-03 by manu@netbsd.org
... There have been many bugs fixed in 1.5.x I ve not pulled up to the 1.4 branch because I m lazy: 1.5.5 (not yet released): Fix bad substitutions in rc
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist scalibility/performances : 10.000 to 20.000 email addresses
2004-08-03 by manu@netbsd.org
... Sounds fine. ... 10 seconds is too short. 10 minutes will be fine. Use -w 10m -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-rcptfilter-0.8 released
2004-08-03 by Jack L. Stone
... number ... Red-faced!!!! Went too fast & forgot a step. Sorry......!! Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator Sage American http://www.sage-american.com
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist scalibility/performances : 10.000 to 20.000 email addresses
2004-08-03 by Cyril Guibourg
... Nope, start with 1.5.3 ... Yes it should, agreed that most RFC compliant MTAs run the first delivery retry after a 30 min. delay.
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-rcptfilter-0.8 released
2004-08-03 by Jack L. Stone
... number ... Drats! Another build error: /usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -lresolv *** Error code 1 You suggested on the earlier version to change -lpthreads
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist scalibility/performances : 10.000 to 20.000 email addresses
2004-08-03 by milter@free.fr
... = sma mentions 20.000/30.000 messages on normal days on one mail-gateway. ... = I m already using MIMEDefang + SA + antivirus software on these platforms
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist scalibility/performances : 10.000 to 20.000 email addresses
2004-08-03 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu I wonder if we should do the same for sender and recipient address. I think it is better, too. manu How expensive a malloc is? I m not sure but
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-rcptfilter-0.8 released
2004-08-03 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... If it doesn t, send me your config file ... The differece is that milter-rcptfilter gives you an access list. It s a nightmare to tell milter-rcptfilter
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-rcptfilter-0.8 released
2004-08-03 by Jack L. Stone
... number ... Emmanuel: Thanks for the new versions. I had already tried v0.7 and still no joy. I ll try this new v0.8 and hope it does the job now. BTW, I m
milter-rcptfilter-0.8 released
2004-08-03 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Hi After this morning s bug hunt, I fixed another minor problem (wrong line number display in the logs), merged back all the configure stuff from
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist scalibility/performances : 10.000 to 20.000 email addresses
2004-08-03 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... I wonder if we should do the same for sender and recipient address. How expensive a malloc is? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist scalibility/performances : 10.000 to 20.000 email addresses
2004-08-03 by Christian Pelissier
... With ~ 1100 email address milter-greylist needs ~ 13 Mb and less than 1 % CPU on a 550 Mhz/512 Mo serveur. It s a more efficient filter than spamassassin
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist scalibility/performances : 10.000 to 20.000 email addresses
2004-08-03 by Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, ... manu You need the memory to hold the whole greylist database. I had a good manu idea of the memory used before the IPv6 patch. Now, the p_addr field
rcptfilter-0.7 released
2004-08-03 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
Hi all I fixed a serious bug in milter-rcptfilter: some data was not properly initialized, thus resulting into random errors in the filtering. Some messages
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist scalibility/performances : 10.000 to 20.000 email addresses
2004-08-03 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... The question is not about the number of addresses, but about the number of messages. ... You need the memory to hold the whole greylist database. I had a
milter-greylist scalibility/performances : 10.000 to 20.000 email addresses
2004-08-03 by milter@free.fr
Hi to all, milter-greylist seems mature but I m wondering about scalibility. I m thinking about deploying it for some 10.000/20.000 existing email addresses (4
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-02 by Graham Murray
... 9.3.0rc2
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-02 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... What version of BIND do you link against? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-02 by Graham Murray
... Linux I have identified the problem, milter-greylist was picking up the getnameinfo from libbind (as libspf was linked against this) rather than glibc and
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-02 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... That s bad because it means you won t be able to reload this dump. What OS? Anyone else has this problem? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-02 by Graham Murray
... Here are the first 2 fields from the end of my current dump:- out006
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-02 by Emmanuel Dreyfus
... How does it look? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus manu@netbsd.org
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-02 by Cyril Guibourg
... Very good point, and I must admit there are much more better testers than me ;-) ... Update to 1.5.4 should not last for a long time.
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-02 by Graham Murray
... No problems so far, IPv6 seems to work fine. I do not get much mail via IPv6 but it worked fine for all I have received since upgrading. I have just a
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-02 by manu@netbsd.org
... On the other hand if everyone relies on Cyril to test it, you ll end up with a program only tested by one person :) This version 1.5.4 has possible issues
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-01 by Jack L. Stone
... Hi, Cyril, Thanks for that clarification. I m already runnning the v-1.5.3 from the ports and what you said about checking it further is exactly why I
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-01 by Cyril Guibourg
... Hello Jack, As maintainer I plan to play a little with 1.5.4 to check that at least nothing is broken with IPv4 before updating the port. If you don t need
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-01 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yep. I ve written some code for building a good spamtrap network, but I m stopped on that front because for now it s quite useless.
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-01 by Scot L. Harris
... If/when that starts to become a problem just combine milter-greylist with a real time block list. The idea being that milter-greylist delays delivery of
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-01 by manu@netbsd.org
... 1.5.4: Avoid race conditions when reloading the config (Attila Bruncsak) Full blown IPv6 support, from Hajimu Umemoto rc-debian.sh script, from Joel
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-01 by Jack L. Stone
... Hi, Emmanuel. Thanks for the new version. Is IPv6 support the only change? (don t need it myself - yet) Also, when will this new one be in FBSD ports as I
Re: [milter-greylist] milter-greylist-1.5.4
2004-08-01 by manu@netbsd.org
... Yes, I don t forget you. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus Il y a 10 sortes de personnes dans le monde: ceux qui comprennent le binaire et ceux qui ne le comprennent