MOTM

Really greay comments, and echo my experience as well.  Not just 
clean output, but BAD ASS tone!

Mike

--- In motm@y..., "jd990exp" <JD990Exp@h...> wrote:
> That was me posting on sonicstate.
> 
> I work for a house record label, and the accumulated instruments 
here 
> are pretty extensive.  I brought a lot of my stuff in, which was a 
> rack-mounted OB8, the Pulse / Drehbank combo, a Nord modular, 
> MKS80/MPG80, and of course the MOTM, which right now stands at 
about 
> 15 modules.
> 
> check out our website at www.wavemusic.com.  there's even a 
picture 
> of me there, somewhere!  No equipment on the site, though.  It's a 
> closed (meaning no outside clients) facility, so we don't even 
> mention that we have a studio.  Even though we make house, this is 
a 
> collective of synth-enthusiasts who have been collecting for a 
> while.  francois K, who owns the label, has mixed Erasure, JM 
Jarre, 
> Kraftwerk, and Depeche Mode amoung others.
> 
> We have a release schedule, usually about four 12" records a 
months, 
> of which about three or four remixes and maybe one or two original 
> sides are done here.  Yes, the MOTM wins hands down.
> 
> It's big, it's clean (inside and out) and it RECALLS!  we can 
repatch 
> it and come close to how it was before it got normalled!  
AWESOME!  
> Also, recording 24-bit Protools the noisefloor is a problem with 
the 
> older machines.  And the MOTM has a certain 'feel' which 
experienced 
> engineers and dance-music enthusiasts just seem to gravitate 
towards.
> 
> Excellent, excellent synth.  Honestly, I liked bringing it in just 
to 
> show everyone how much better it was than that old, maintenance-
heavy 
> vintage stuff.  Now with the frequency shifter coming out, I can 
put 
> it next to the Bode and really stir things up!