MOTM

Here we have an MS50, MS20, Serge 3000 series (two panels), two System 700 panels, an Arp2600, a
Prophet 5, a MiniMoog, an MKS80/MPG80, an OB8, an Xpander, a few SEM's, a MemoryMoog and an MOTM.

The MOTM gets used the most.

I'll say!  Who was it from?  Or if you can't say, was it a well-
known person or an organization or what?

Mike

--- In motm@y..., "Paul Schreiber" <synth1@a...> wrote:
>  Here we have an MS50, MS20, Serge 3000 series (two panels), two 
System 700 panels, an Arp2600, a
> Prophet 5, a MiniMoog, an MKS80/MPG80, an OB8, an Xpander, a few 
SEM's, a MemoryMoog and an MOTM.
> 
> The MOTM gets used the most.

That was me posting on sonicstate.

I work for a house record label, and the accumulated instruments here 
are pretty extensive.  I brought a lot of my stuff in, which was a 
rack-mounted OB8, the Pulse / Drehbank combo, a Nord modular, 
MKS80/MPG80, and of course the MOTM, which right now stands at about 
15 modules.

check out our website at www.wavemusic.com.  there's even a picture 
of me there, somewhere!  No equipment on the site, though.  It's a 
closed (meaning no outside clients) facility, so we don't even 
mention that we have a studio.  Even though we make house, this is a 
collective of synth-enthusiasts who have been collecting for a 
while.  francois K, who owns the label, has mixed Erasure, JM Jarre, 
Kraftwerk, and Depeche Mode amoung others.

We have a release schedule, usually about four 12" records a months, 
of which about three or four remixes and maybe one or two original 
sides are done here.  Yes, the MOTM wins hands down.

It's big, it's clean (inside and out) and it RECALLS!  we can repatch 
it and come close to how it was before it got normalled!  AWESOME!  
Also, recording 24-bit Protools the noisefloor is a problem with the 
older machines.  And the MOTM has a certain 'feel' which experienced 
engineers and dance-music enthusiasts just seem to gravitate towards.

Excellent, excellent synth.  Honestly, I liked bringing it in just to 
show everyone how much better it was than that old, maintenance-heavy 
vintage stuff.  Now with the frequency shifter coming out, I can put 
it next to the Bode and really stir things up!

Really greay comments, and echo my experience as well.  Not just 
clean output, but BAD ASS tone!

Mike

--- In motm@y..., "jd990exp" <JD990Exp@h...> wrote:
> That was me posting on sonicstate.
> 
> I work for a house record label, and the accumulated instruments 
here 
> are pretty extensive.  I brought a lot of my stuff in, which was a 
> rack-mounted OB8, the Pulse / Drehbank combo, a Nord modular, 
> MKS80/MPG80, and of course the MOTM, which right now stands at 
about 
> 15 modules.
> 
> check out our website at www.wavemusic.com.  there's even a 
picture 
> of me there, somewhere!  No equipment on the site, though.  It's a 
> closed (meaning no outside clients) facility, so we don't even 
> mention that we have a studio.  Even though we make house, this is 
a 
> collective of synth-enthusiasts who have been collecting for a 
> while.  francois K, who owns the label, has mixed Erasure, JM 
Jarre, 
> Kraftwerk, and Depeche Mode amoung others.
> 
> We have a release schedule, usually about four 12" records a 
months, 
> of which about three or four remixes and maybe one or two original 
> sides are done here.  Yes, the MOTM wins hands down.
> 
> It's big, it's clean (inside and out) and it RECALLS!  we can 
repatch 
> it and come close to how it was before it got normalled!  
AWESOME!  
> Also, recording 24-bit Protools the noisefloor is a problem with 
the 
> older machines.  And the MOTM has a certain 'feel' which 
experienced 
> engineers and dance-music enthusiasts just seem to gravitate 
towards.
> 
> Excellent, excellent synth.  Honestly, I liked bringing it in just 
to 
> show everyone how much better it was than that old, maintenance-
heavy 
> vintage stuff.  Now with the frequency shifter coming out, I can 
put 
> it next to the Bode and really stir things up!