Hi Y'all- I whole-heartedly agree with Larry's thought. I did the same thing, one 380 and one 390. That's a whole boat-load of LFOs in 2U of width. My reasoning was similar to Larry's: I wanted at least one to be VC'able, but I'm also always using a few for free running purposes. *AND* I didn't really want to take up 2U of space with a single LFO, albeit a fuller-featured one. The price is nice at $99 for each of the two, too! I'm pleased with the choice... Frank -----Original Message----- From: J. Larry Hendry [mailto:jlarryh@...] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:55 PM To: motm@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Points clarification Yes, I have a thought. You can never have too many LFOs. :) And, an 320 is a bit of overkill every time you need an LFO. 380 makes sense if you want complex waveforms. The 390 makes sense if you still need some voltage control. I got one of each. :) Larry H
Message
Re: 380 and 390 LFOs (was: points clarification)
2003-01-31 by Frank Vanaman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.