MOTM

Yes, I have one of each, too.  And recall that the 320 has a SYNC in!

--- In motm@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Vanaman" <fvanaman@s...> wrote:
> Hi Y'all-
> 
> I whole-heartedly agree with Larry's thought. I did the same thing, 
one 380
> and one 390. That's a whole boat-load of LFOs in 2U of width. My 
reasoning
> was similar to Larry's: I wanted at least one to be VC'able, but 
I'm also
> always using a few for free running purposes. *AND* I didn't really 
want to
> take up 2U of space with a single LFO, albeit a fuller-featured 
one. The
> price is nice at $99 for each of the two, too!
> 
> I'm pleased with the choice...
> 
> Frank
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. Larry Hendry [mailto:jlarryh@i...]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 2:55 PM
> To: motm@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [motm] Re: Points clarification
> 
> Yes, I have a thought.  You can never have too many LFOs.  :)  And, 
an 320
> is a bit of overkill every time you need an LFO. 380 makes sense if 
you want
> complex waveforms.  The 390 makes sense if you still need some 
voltage
> control.  I got one of each. :)
> 
> Larry H