Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: [motm] MOTM-510 usage

2006-10-10 by Richard Brewster

Thank you, Tom.  These are interesting, even if I don't know what a 
Roland JD-800 or a Korg EMX are.  I am a little confused about the 
patch.  You write, typically:

Audio: JD-800 -> MOTM-120 -> MOTM-510 -> MOTM-410
CV: MOTM-510 (full out) -> MOTM-410 (rate)

I know it is hard to describe a patch in words.

Does this mean that you are using the MOTM-510 Audio Out as the input to 
the MOTM-410, and Full Out of the same MOTM-510 as a control input to 
the MOTM-410?  If that's the case, I don't understand it, because the 
MOTM-410 rate input controls the rate of the internal LFO's.  I'm not 
sure what it means to control an LFO rate with an audio frequency 
signal.  Perhaps the modulating signal feeds through somehow.  I'll have 
to try it. (See, this is my theoretical mind, the mind that normally 
does not think to modulate an LFO rate with a high frequency control.  
In the case you modulate the MOTM-410 DEPTH with the 510 output, since 
that is a VCA the control signal would mix through.  But you only used 
that with the TBE-Sound04.

Does it make much difference to the sound if you disconnect the MOTM-510 
Full Out from the 410 CV inputs?

-Richard Brewster
http://www.pugix.com


Tom Adam wrote:
> Oeps....
>
> http://users.pandora.be/the-big-ear/temp/TBE-samples.pdf 
>
>
>
>
>
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.