Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Message

Re: MOTM-510 usage

2006-10-10 by Mike Marsh

I *think* if I've read this right that the 510 is generating LFO speed
signals since it is being fed by the 120...?

Mike

--- In motm@...m, Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote:
>
> Thank you, Tom.  These are interesting, even if I don't know what a 
> Roland JD-800 or a Korg EMX are.  I am a little confused about the 
> patch.  You write, typically:
> 
> Audio: JD-800 -> MOTM-120 -> MOTM-510 -> MOTM-410
> CV: MOTM-510 (full out) -> MOTM-410 (rate)
> 
> I know it is hard to describe a patch in words.
> 
> Does this mean that you are using the MOTM-510 Audio Out as the
input to 
> the MOTM-410, and Full Out of the same MOTM-510 as a control input to 
> the MOTM-410?  If that's the case, I don't understand it, because the 
> MOTM-410 rate input controls the rate of the internal LFO's.  I'm not 
> sure what it means to control an LFO rate with an audio frequency 
> signal.  Perhaps the modulating signal feeds through somehow.  I'll
have 
> to try it. (See, this is my theoretical mind, the mind that normally 
> does not think to modulate an LFO rate with a high frequency control.  
> In the case you modulate the MOTM-410 DEPTH with the 510 output, since 
> that is a VCA the control signal would mix through.  But you only used 
> that with the TBE-Sound04.
> 
> Does it make much difference to the sound if you disconnect the
MOTM-510 
> Full Out from the 410 CV inputs?
> 
> -Richard Brewster
> http://www.pugix.com
> 
> 
> Tom Adam wrote:
> > Oeps....
> >
> > http://users.pandora.be/the-big-ear/temp/TBE-samples.pdf 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.