I *think* if I've read this right that the 510 is generating LFO speed signals since it is being fed by the 120...? Mike --- In motm@...m, Richard Brewster <pugix@...> wrote: > > Thank you, Tom. These are interesting, even if I don't know what a > Roland JD-800 or a Korg EMX are. I am a little confused about the > patch. You write, typically: > > Audio: JD-800 -> MOTM-120 -> MOTM-510 -> MOTM-410 > CV: MOTM-510 (full out) -> MOTM-410 (rate) > > I know it is hard to describe a patch in words. > > Does this mean that you are using the MOTM-510 Audio Out as the input to > the MOTM-410, and Full Out of the same MOTM-510 as a control input to > the MOTM-410? If that's the case, I don't understand it, because the > MOTM-410 rate input controls the rate of the internal LFO's. I'm not > sure what it means to control an LFO rate with an audio frequency > signal. Perhaps the modulating signal feeds through somehow. I'll have > to try it. (See, this is my theoretical mind, the mind that normally > does not think to modulate an LFO rate with a high frequency control. > In the case you modulate the MOTM-410 DEPTH with the 510 output, since > that is a VCA the control signal would mix through. But you only used > that with the TBE-Sound04. > > Does it make much difference to the sound if you disconnect the MOTM-510 > Full Out from the 410 CV inputs? > > -Richard Brewster > http://www.pugix.com > > > Tom Adam wrote: > > Oeps.... > > > > http://users.pandora.be/the-big-ear/temp/TBE-samples.pdf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: MOTM-510 usage
2006-10-10 by Mike Marsh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.