>>Yeah, this can be done, but it seems like quite a kludge, to be >basically converting a CV signal to MIDI, then back again. > >OK, I haven't seen this Kurzweil thingy, but if you feeling brave you >could always hack the thing to get at the analogue signal inside the >unit. This is what I have done inside my D-50's aftertouch sensor, its a >simple 0-5V CV that can be patched straight into the modular. No need to >go to the MIDI middle man. Et viola no quantised stepping. But, all of >which could have avoided if Roland and others had adopted the full >16-bits allocated for aftertouch in the first place. > This is what I've been wondering all along. I know there's an anlog signal coming from the ribbon. I'm just hesitant to spend ~$550 for the whole expressionmate just for this kind of experiment. I wonder who makes the ribbon, and if it's available seperately? ____________________________________________ Dave Trenkel : improv@... Minus Web Site: http://listen.to/minusmusic Minus MP3's: http://www.mp3.com/-minus- ____________________________________________
Message
Re: [motm] MIDI sucks (get your attention?)
2000-08-11 by improv@peak.org
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.