Re: [motm] Frequency Shifter - one more potential panel
2003-11-08 by Scott E.
Still Definitely Proto4a. 4b moves jacks to close to the lower knobs. Scott
Messages
Browse messages
Page 265 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - vote total and another question
2003-11-08 by John Loffink
I would nudge the columns of knobs towards the center if that prevents interference with an adjoining UEG or FS module. John Loffink The Microtonal Synthesis
Re: Frequency Shifter - one more potential panel
2003-11-08 by strohs56k
... Even though I like the idea of having the outputs stacked up to match the control knobs, my vote is still for version 4a. As to the control knobs, my
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - one more potential panel
2003-11-08 by Richard Brewster
Still 4a. Richard
Re: Frequency Shifter - one more potential panel
2003-11-08 by mate_stubb
I still prefer 4a. Moe ... it on the ... trivial
Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-08 by mate_stubb
I like 4a the best. Moe ... some big
Another delay
2003-11-08 by J. Larry Hendry
Two 12+ hour work days and a family member visit have put me behind sending out the last of the cables invoices. Sorry Larry
Re: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - more questions
2003-11-08 by Mike Estee
... Yes indeed! After the website changes/3rd party discussion I think it s clear to me that the MOTM format is fast on its way to being the closest thing to a
Re: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - more questions
2003-11-08 by groovyshaman@snet.net
By the way, a big thank-you to Paul for allowing this Encore Electronics bandwidth! George
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - more questions
2003-11-08 by Scott Juskiw
... I prefer +/- ... Centre detent is only useful if it really is zero at centre. I say no to centre detent. p.s. Isn t Paul going to be surprised when he
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - one more potential panel
2003-11-08 by Scott Juskiw
I still prefer 4a, the jacks look weird when they re not on the regular grid.
Re: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - more questions
2003-11-08 by groovyshaman@snet.net
+/- markings would be nice. I say NO to center detents. Symmetry between FS and UEG doesn t matter. Still like panel 4a (over 4b). Yes, I actually plan to buy
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - vote total and another question
2003-11-08 by Scott Juskiw
... I prefer nudging the columns inwards, just to leave enough finger space for whatever module is on either side of the FS. That extra bit of finger room
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - one more potential panel
2003-11-08 by Tony Karavidas
One panel was submitted to me in the past few minutes and I posted it on the site. If you go back to this directory, you ll find another file (4b)
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - more questions
2003-11-08 by Tony Karavidas
Another two issues: 1. The text will be arbitrary numbers around the Coarse shift. (I have my reasons) Should they be +/- because this is a through-zero
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - vote total and another question
2003-11-08 by Tony Karavidas
So far we have 5 people for #4 and 16 people for #4a. I think 4A is clearly the winner even if we get a bunch more people voting this weekend. Someone brought
RE: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-08 by John Loffink
If they were somewhat calibrated to real frequency values, then yes. Otherwise it doesn t matter. John Loffink The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-08 by Tony Karavidas
The feedback is really around the outer loop anyway, so if you really had to you could mix it externally.
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-08 by John Loffink
Agree. 4a John Loffink The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site
Re: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-08 by groovyshaman@snet.net
Oh yea, and it will sound awesome too. Now we just need to come up with a mod to break into the feedback path, for all sorts of non-linear madness! ... George
Re: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-08 by Richard Brewster
I agree. Darn, it looks like I need another cabinet already. -Richard Brewster
Re: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by groovyshaman@snet.net
Layout 4a with numbers would be great. This one will look amazing in the cabinet. George
Re: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Mike Estee
... So I was going to write: No. Not unless they re objective. Like octaves or something. I don t care for subjective numbers (this one goes to eleven!) Then
Re: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Joe Pavone
This is also a good idea and if it s not too much trouble it should be added, I think this would look better and some may find it usefull. My numbers vote=yes
Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by strohs56k
... I say 4a :) I think it is better to center the top jacks to give a little more room around the lower row of knobs. (As at least two other people already
Re: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Tobias Enhus
... Tobias
RE: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Scott Juskiw
I use numbers to document patches. Maybe I m just stupid, but I never seem to be able to figure out which tick-mark corresponds to which number on the UEG
RE: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Tony Karavidas
Why? And does anyone else want numbers? Thanks, Tony
Re: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Scott Juskiw
This is great Tony, I vote for 4a. I hate to sound like a whiner, but any chance of getting numbers around the big knob? ... I usually wear sun glasses while
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Tony Karavidas
That drawing isn t precise. (the right row looks too close.) The edge will be the same distance as the UEG. Tony
Re: [motm] Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Mike Estee
... Blue is so 2002, lets put some UV LEDs in there! my eyes feel funny.... ^_^
Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by neutrino000
I vote for this one: http://www.encoreelectronics.com/FS/FreqShift_Proto4a.jpg but with blue LEDs...Just kidding!! -KB
Re: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Mike Estee
... +1 Looks nice! Anyway you can pull in the edge knobs a hair? The lack of an edge margin looks a tad odd. (Everyone s a critic, I know ;) ) --mikes
Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by jwfleck60625
I vote for: FreqShift_Proto4.jpg but either would work for me. Thanks - John
Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by paulhaneberg
I vote for 4a.
Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by gooboworks
... some big ... I vote for this one, I like the symmetry. The knobs are not near where the cables could interfere. Very nice this one is. Andy
RE: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Eric Frampton
I like this one better. ... e
RE: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Scott Gibbons
I ll buy either of these, but my preferred is: http://www.encoreelectronics.com/FS/FreqShift_Proto4.jpg best, - Scott ____________ http://www.red-noise.com
Re: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Paul Schreiber
... Paul S.
Re: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Joe Pavone
http://www.encoreelectronics.com/FS/FreqShift_Proto4a.jpg looks good to me. The centered sine/cosine outs will give you more finger room around the down
Re: Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by josephcasbarian
Ask and you shall receive! Paul s responsiveness to the Arp filter and Delay, now Tony and this layout. Pretty nice! The number 2 design makes more sense,
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter - new look - new vote
2003-11-07 by Tony Karavidas
OK, after all that back and forth about how it looks, I ve made some big changes and here are the final two choices:
RE: [motm] Frequency Shifter power connector
2003-11-07 by Tony Karavidas
It s already done! (I was doing that anyway and they your email popped up!) Thanks, Tony
Frequency Shifter power connector
2003-11-07 by Scott Juskiw
Hi Tony, one last thing I wanted to ask about the FS layout. On the UEG, the power connector is positioned in such a way that makes it impossible to mount a
cable stand
2003-11-07 by J. Larry Hendry
... From: osthelder How are the hardwood triangles mounted to the upright? --LH-- The stand aluminum tube diameter is exactly 1 .
FS: MOTM/Blacet/Stooge/FutureRetro/Misc
2003-11-07 by les_chupacabra
Hey Guys - it s been a while since I ve been around. The past year or so I ve found myself getting back into guitar and have finally admitted to myself I m
Switch debouncing - OT
2003-11-07 by Richard Brewster
Off topic, but I couldn t resist. A neat circuit for debouncing a switch using 1/6 of a CD4010 chip can be found in Electronotes #73, page 11. It is a simple
Re: [motm] Another viewpoint - Frequency Shifter group question
2003-11-07 by elhardt@att.net
Just a few points. Yes, some of us who haven t chimed in didn t do so because we aren t overly concerned with every little layout detail. After all the
[motm] Re: Frequency Shifter (improved layout idea)
2003-11-06 by Scott Juskiw
... Also, IMHO, you need an additional display to indicate the current value. Otherwise you d never be able to document a patch.
Re: Frequency Shifter (improved layout idea)
2003-11-06 by strohs56k
... I seem to remember this being discussed - one camp liked the idea of multi-turn pots because it gives you more resolution, the other camp liked single turn