Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 372 of 690 · 34488 messages matched

Re: modules review

2002-06-23 by sasami@hotkey.net.au

... well... yeah. I actually do own a couple of MOTM modules... ... No offence taken. Cheers, Ken ...

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Re: Re: modules review

2002-06-21 by vulture.squadron@syol.com

... From: ... ah ha - lurker ahoy..? sorry, what i meant was the board errors that you d already documented - at that particular moment

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Re: modules review

2002-06-21 by sasami@hotkey.net.au

... Hey! I resemble that remark! Seriously, if you spot something, email me! Ken _______________________________________________________________________ Ken

Thread view Attachments: 0

June 2003

2002-06-20 by Robair, Gino

Paul wrote: Should we mark our calendars for next June, then? ;-) [back to lurking...]

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Re: modules review

2002-06-19 by vulture.squadron@syol.com

... hello all, please no one quote me on this but i believe paul & roger have a good working relationship as manufacturers they work very hard to provide

Thread view Attachments: 0

[motm] Re: modules review

2002-06-19 by Simon

Roger says... ... We re lucky Paul has thicker skin. I doubt Roger could have handled the type of public MOTM bashing Paul received from Mr.P on AH. I think

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 100K pot shortage

2002-06-19 by mmarsh100

Happily, I don t see the 490 on the list! Mike ... running ... the ... http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] 100K pot shortage

2002-06-19 by Paul Schreiber

The following USE 100K log pots: MOTM-380 MOTM-390 MOTM-420 MOTM-440 MOTM-830 MOTM-890 Houston, we got a problem :( Paul S. ... From: osthelder

Thread view Attachments: 0

100K pot shortage

2002-06-19 by osthelder

Hi all! Which modules do NOT use the 100K pots? If we re going to be running short of these, I ll order modules that don t use 100K pots in the meantime. Chub

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Re: [motm] MOTM Module Ideas

2002-06-19 by J. Larry Hendry

YES !!! YES !!! YES !!! ... From: Paul Schreiber Yes, I plan a 500-Series, Super Duper Interpolating Scanner for next year.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Please stop already

2002-06-19 by capngare@aol.com

Why can t we all just get along ? Everyones entitled to their opinion,and Paul voiced his. Like he said..let s move on. There must be more constructive things

Thread view Attachments: 0

OT: vintage

2002-06-19 by jhaible@debitel.net

http://cgi.liveauctions.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1834314676 Would this be the perfect chair in front of the mixing console in your studio ?! JH.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Please stop already

2002-06-19 by Paul Schreiber

... I admitted this, SO DROP IT ALREADY EVERYBODY. I get 1 gloat per year, this was it. ... Because by you own admission is was CHEAPER. Wait until the 500

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Re: [motm] MOTM Module Ideas

2002-06-19 by Paul Schreiber

Yes, I plan a 500-Series, Super Duper Interpolating Scanner for next year. So many modules, so little time. On THAT front: I have signed an outsourcing

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Re: modules review

2002-06-19 by Sikorsky

... From: ... of course opinions count for nothing in flame wars nevermind, i d love to see the interpolating scanner in motm form maybe

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Re: modules review

2002-06-19 by jhaible@debitel.net

... modular on a scope? Spikes, overshoots, crosstalk everwhere. It looks like an electron battlefield. Dangerous, dangererous! I have seen *other* people

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Re: [motm] MOTM Module Ideas

2002-06-19 by jhaible@debitel.net

... Well, I surely don t want to start Doepfer bashing again (so tired of it), but someone sent me the schemos of the module in question, and it looks like a

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Re: modules review

2002-06-19 by Sikorsky

hello all, well, we all make mistakes roger is dead unhappy about stuff that slipped the net paul s is dead unhappy about stuff he misses tony allgood is dead

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: modules review

2002-06-19 by Len DeFazio

Here is the complete response of Roger to the review of his new modules posted to this list, as he as posted to his list: Message: 2 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Is Paul mean? Or just too human?

2002-06-19 by elle_webb

It s a little akward seeing somebody rub their competitor s nose in the dirt. We all get enough of that every time there s an election. Fortunately, we haven t

Thread view Attachments: 0

Short MOTM-380 LFO review

2002-06-19 by J. Larry Hendry

In any modular synth system, it seems hard to have enough LFOs (for me anyhow). The MOTM-380 just fits the need for a basic LFO without voltage control. The

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Re: Is Paul mean?

2002-06-18 by Paul Schreiber

... I concur, so let s move on. I am a little stressed out, tomorrow is Justify Why We Shouldn t Fire You Immediately day, so yes, I admit, I was gloating

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Re: 500 series/update

2002-06-18 by Paul Schreiber

I have 109 left. About 45 are spoken for assembled modules as of today. I have about 10ea of 420, 380, and 440 *kits* already made up with the pots. (not

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Is Paul mean?

2002-06-18 by paulhaneberg

I appreciate everything I read in this forum, good and bad. I run a high end studio with lots of synths and most of them I bought on a recommendation. The

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: 500 series/update

2002-06-18 by geblinkoort

... ordered 1000 more BUT delivery is ... them out on a module-by-module ... into full scale shipping, just ... use them for *assembled* ... When do you

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Is Paul mean?

2002-06-18 by vulture.squadron@syol.com

... giving him an ... hello all, don t know how to put this the way i intend it (with a big :-)) but i d hate to think all the shite going on at Gas Station

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Formants file

2002-06-18 by mmarsh100

That s really bad news. How about a fast RISC processor, then? Csound is ported to just about every major processor I can think of... ... shelved. ... be ...

Thread view Attachments: 0

Is Paul mean?

2002-06-18 by Paul Schreiber

... In a way, yes. HOWEVER, it was on a PUBLIC FORUM (AH). Now, if it was the .com forum, it would have STAYED THERE. If Roger wants to be mad at somebody, be

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Formants file

2002-06-18 by mate_stubb

... I heard that ANalog Devices has a Csound-on-a-chip. That could be cool!

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: Formants file

2002-06-18 by mmarsh100

With regard to a generic DSP module as described by Tom, how would it be programmed? DSP machine code (hard)? Some kind of script (cool)? How about Csound

Thread view Attachments: 0

Formants file

2002-06-18 by mmarsh100

Hi All - In response to Tom s post I put up a small example of vocal formant stuff. I did this with a Nord Micro Modular which will do all the stuff he

Thread view Attachments: 0

New file uploaded to motm

2002-06-18 by motm@yahoogroups.com

Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the motm group. File : /EeAwh.mp3

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] Digest Number 1345

2002-06-18 by revtor@aol.com

cool Ideas Tom, glad to see others are always thinking of new module ideas.. THe vocal filter, I think Pauls fixed filter bank will get you most of the way

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [motm] MOTM Module Ideas

2002-06-18 by Thomas Hudson

... I have the UltraProteus and it is the only digital synth I ve ever liked. It is basically a Morpheus with extra samples. The Z plane filters are really

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.