Re: MOTM-450 layout
2002-04-14 by coyoteous
It s a mixer with a filter on each input, each of which is multed to the input, correct? Barry INPUT I I--LP---in01--I M I I--BP1--in02--I I
Messages
Browse messages
Page 386 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
The Ultimate Analog?
2002-04-14 by Scott Evans, Gen Mgr
Could this be the ultimate analog? You decide! Scott http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=858296181
RE: [motm] UEG
2002-04-14 by Tony Karavidas
Here s an image of the UEG with the new firmware. http://www.encoreelectronics.com/motm/UEG_R20.JPG It was just a quick example of a 4 stage LOOPONLY mode
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM-450 layout
2002-04-13 by jhaible
... I correct you. (;- ) You re thinking equalizer - this is a filter bank. See Paul s link to the Moog archives site for more details. JH. But, doesn t
MOTM-450 operation
2002-04-13 by Paul Schreiber
a) the frequency bands are the same as the Moog 907A. There is data at: http://moogarchives.com b) the filters used are bandpass, but the peak is at 0dB, ie
Re: MOTM-450 layout
2002-04-13 by sasquatch98930
... Please correct me if I m wrong. But, doesn t increasing the level of a band also increase a resonance peak in the center of that band. If this how the MOTM
Re: [motm] New poll for motm
2002-04-13 by jhaible
... left, ... on ... Consider yourself *lucky* that Yahoo does not know you. I guess you are member of the list since the time before Yahoo took over, just
tweaking the grid...
2002-04-13 by drg3orge
h3y all, these are my thoughts about tweakin the grid... when i have a 3rd party pcb i am convertin to the MOTM form factor that will not fit the current
FW: [motm] New poll for motm
2002-04-13 by Tkacs, Ken
Well, as usual, I can t get into the ^%#$^#& Yahoo site... it tells me left, right, & center that I don t exist, even though I get an Email from them on
RE: [motm] Re: MOTM-450 layout
2002-04-13 by Les Mizzell
... Oh yea....I can think of a ton of uses for an inverted output.... Add my vote to that one. Les Mizzell - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ERROR 406: file
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 layout
2002-04-13 by jhaible
... No, 0 ... 10 is fine. It s a filterbank, not an Equalizer. All pots at 7 will have the same frequency response as all pots at 3, just the output level will
Re: MOTM-450 layout
2002-04-13 by coyoteous
An inverted output would be excellent (very useful for cancellation effects), JH seemed to like this idea. Barry
RE: [motm] UEG (Was RE: Frequency Shifter)
2002-04-13 by Tony Karavidas
One more thing, I did get the LOOP ONLY mode of the UEG to output a trigger pulse on either the start of each stage or just the first stage within a loop. It s
RE: [motm] RE: Frequency Shifter
2002-04-13 by Tony Karavidas
It s going very slowly. As many of you know (well, all of you after this email) I m designing the Midiman SurfaceOne and I m working A LOT trying to get that
Re: MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-13 by Graham Hunter
I haven t read all the e-mails following this yet, but I ve just got to comment now... ... I have a UEG, and it looks just fine in the rack next to the MOTM
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 layout
2002-04-13 by Paul Schreiber
Actually, they are *cut* only (non-shelving). Mult out may be a good idea. Paul S. ... From: John Loffink To: MOTM List Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:40 PM
RE: [motm] MOTM-450 layout
2002-04-13 by John Loffink
In all the controversy no one seemed to notice that cut/boost knobs should be labeled -5 to +5, not 0 to 10. Also, since any of the options seem to have some
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-13 by Charles Stella
The layout looks great! I am pysched to have an MOTM quality EQ. As far as the controls I am not sure if the board layout determined the positioning or not. If
Re: [motm] New poll for motm
2002-04-13 by mate_stubb
... I voted as instructed. But, I thought I read that Bypass is changed to EQ IN or OUT . Or did I just dream that? Larry H
Re: [motm] New poll for motm
2002-04-13 by J. Larry Hendry
I voted as instructed. But, I thought I read that Bypass is changed to EQ IN or OUT . Or did I just dream that? Larry H ... From:
Re: [motm] New poll for motm
2002-04-13 by Paul Schreiber
Don t worry about *text*, worry about knob placement. Paul S. ... From: J. Larry Hendry To: Sent: Friday, April
RE: new poll
2002-04-13 by mate_stubb
Also, please follow the instructions and vote at the link on the message, your vote won t count if you send it directly to the usual list address! Moe
RE; new poll
2002-04-13 by mate_stubb
Please forget about the first poll I created, I screwed it up and deleted it. But vote in the second one, please! Moe
New poll for motm
2002-04-13 by motm@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the motm group: Choose the fixed filterbank design that you prefer. Please vote only once. o
New poll for motm
2002-04-13 by motm@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the motm group: Choose the design layout for the fixed filterbank that you most prefer. Please vote
"Slide" suggested for ribbon
2002-04-12 by J. Larry Hendry
Someone (sorry lost the mail) suggested this device called Slide at www.InfusionSystems.com to be used for a short ribbon controller. In inquired about it.
RE: Frequency Shifter
2002-04-12 by mate_stubb
... There s no big logo on the Frequency shifter. Were you talking about the logo on the Expressionist 2 proto? Tony
RE: [motm] Changing The Grid??
2002-04-12 by Tony Karavidas
There s no big logo on the Frequency shifter. Were you talking about the logo on the Expressionist 2 proto? Tony
MOTM-450 layout
2002-04-12 by J. Larry Hendry
Well since almost everyone else has spoken their piece on this, I will enter mine. 1. Actually, any layout is fine, as most have said, it is about the sound.
Changing The Grid??
2002-04-12 by J. Larry Hendry
... From: Tkacs, Ken Also, regarding the UEG (as an example of a module that really deviated), it doesn t really look particularly foreign
RE: [motm] Hot as Hell Texas Vintage Synth Get Together
2002-04-12 by Tentochi
Here is the info Roger posted: http://www.synthesizers.com/mok.html --Shemp
Hot as Hell Texas Vintage Synth Get Together
2002-04-12 by Paul Schreiber
Roger Arrick (synth.com) and I are putting together a general vintage synth get together June 22nd. No real firm details yet. Not a selling event, a fun tweak
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek -- Changing The Grid, Yay or Nay...?
2002-04-12 by Adam Schabtach
... The other funny thing--well, I think it s funny, anyway--is that not long ago people were talking about grinding the paint off the edges of their panels or
RE: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by Vehorn, Benjamin
Wow. No offense to anyone, but I can t believe anyone would care that much about pure cosmetics.
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by mate_stubb
... Also, what about having the panel graphic include the center frequency for the filter, as they are not sweepable or parametric. Just a thought.
Re: MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by mmarsh100
I assumed the LED was clip indicator, but I gather from other posts that it is really an ON indicator. We have the space, how about a clip LED as well? Mike
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by mate_stubb
... d00D!! Lose the bypass switch and LED, and make it 2U. Other than that it looks great :)
MOTM-450 peek -- Changing The Grid, Yay or Nay...?
2002-04-12 by Tkacs, Ken
I agree with the sentiments that the new module should not look too foreign alongside the MOTM modules, but I think the difference will be a lot smaller than
Re: FM Bells
2002-04-12 by mmarsh100
Bell/metallic patches are really fun to do on the MOTM. There are many ways to get something interesting but here is a suggestion for a starting point: * Fire
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by Scott Evans, Gen Mgr
... I am in agreement here. If the intent is just to see how the sound is modified by the bypass switch, this can easily be done with some creative patching.
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek +
2002-04-12 by Jeffrey Pontius
... My counter $0.02: Audio and cv quality and options are *the* primary objectives over any other consideration; with panel ergonomics second (enhances our
Re: FW: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by CHRIS PARKER
... I really don t know...I d have to think about it hard. Up until now, I ve bought at least two of each MOTM module...but they ve all been of the same
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by media.nai@rcn.com
... d00D!! Lose the bypass switch and LED, and make it 2U. Other than that it looks great :) If you insist on wasting an entire panel unit (which would be one
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 escalation
2002-04-12 by Scott Juskiw
... Sounds like you may still be able to put the 8 bandpass pots in two columns using the old pot spacing, and put the lowpass and highpass pots off board in
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by Adam Schabtach
Having just discovered that I already have plans for more modules than will fit in the cabinet I designed, I would cast a vote against a 4U format. But I¹m
Re: FW: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by thomas white
Its not the grid but the 2 knobs that will be between other jackas and cables if this is placed between say, 2 440 VCF s. Just my 2 cents. I really don t see
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by jwbarlow@aol.com
I like this, though I d like to see a 4u mock up, if one exists, if only for comparison. (I too like the Moog FFB layout) Without knowing how the bypass
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by mate_stubb
... Keeping future modules within the current MOTM form factor is very important to me. It seems to me that the current design for the 450 could fit in
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 escalation
2002-04-12 by Paul Schreiber
Just keep in mind, the goal is a *low-noise* design. And, who is to say this is the first and *only* filter bank? I am still a vocoder fan, remember :) I think
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-12 by Paul Schreiber
I agree. Moe, let s label the switch EQ IN / EQ OUT. BTW: this is an active filter design, not passive like the Moog 907A. No voltage-control, no feedback