Re: [motm] MOTM UK!!!
2002-04-17 by James Richardson
... Nice idea Paul. I hadn t appreciated that Newcastle was a hot bed of MOTM/Oakley activity. Who are the other culprits? But does anyone have the
Messages
Browse messages
Page 385 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-17 by mmarsh100
Just to clarify - you re not quoting me here, although I agree that the ideal would be a gain pot and a bypass switch (or neither!). Mike ... control. ... only
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-17 by jhaible
... No one ? Hmm, I did exactly that, it works great, and as my prototype is the only unit in existence, I could even conclude that it works to 100% ! (;- )
Re: Any 410 kits arrive?
2002-04-17 by mmarsh100
How many days late and by what carrier? Mike ... to
RE: [motm] Grids, Layouts and the 310
2002-04-17 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
Odd that I never noticed that... However, it looks like ALL the micro-modules have the jack names below, which is a nice consistancy thing. --PBr ... From:
Module Ideas
2002-04-17 by Les Mizzell
You folks think that you drive Roger or Paul crazy with module ideas and knob placement arguments, but they re not the only ones. Since most of my system is
RE: [motm] Any 410 kits arrive?
2002-04-17 by Tentochi
The kits will be arriving a few days later than I originally quoted to everyone. Larry already has his. --Todd
Re: [motm] Re: MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-17 by media.nai@rcn.com
... If it has a bypass switch then it needs a gain control. If it doesn t have a bypass switch then it doesn t need a gain control. It s ridiculous to have one
test post please ignore
2002-04-17 by mate_stubb
My last two posts haven t shown up, what s going on? Moe
Request
2002-04-17 by Paul Schreiber
I want to borrow for 2 days a synth.com Moog ladder module and a MFooger filter pedal. Even a MODCAN Moog filter would be nice. Reason: I want to compare idle
Final MOTM-450 poll results
2002-04-17 by mate_stubb
The UI poll for the MOTM-450 filterbank is closed. We had 50 votes this time, and a clear preference was declared. Thanks for voting.
Re: [motm] Grids, Layouts and the 310
2002-04-17 by Jim Black
I, for one, like the uniformity. So, it drives me nuts that the 310 has the jack description BELOW the jack - unlike all the other modules. Also, obviously
Re: Any 410 kits arrive?
2002-04-17 by mmarsh100
I haven t received mine yet. Todd said that we should get them by tomorrow... Do you know what carrier he used? Mike
Re: [motm] Any 410 kits arrive?
2002-04-17 by thomas white
Not yet, hopefully tomorrow. Anybody know what method of shipping was used? Todd? Can t wait since I have no money for other parts right now. Does anybody also
RE: [motm] The Ultimate Analog? (No, but this is)
2002-04-17 by Alan Wagner
Wow, that organ is cavernous! I wonder how it sounds… Splunk Splunk Splunk Can you play chamber music on it? All it took was some ‘drip’ to build it! Did
Re: [oakley-synths] MOTM UK!!!
2002-04-16 by keithw@cix.co.uk
In-Reply-To: hello all, ... Hi all, I would love a meet although I have no transport and Sheffield would be easier
Any 410 kits arrive?
2002-04-16 by J. Larry Hendry
Anybody get their 410 kits from Todd? Larry
Why I like uniformly spaced knobs.
2002-04-16 by echophazer
For my purposes the MOTM cornrow look works. I don t use a keyboard or any other input devices other than my selection of modules. This means I have to move
MOTM UK!!!
2002-04-16 by sikorsky
hello all, i know this comes up every now and again, but i ve realised there s a clutch of motm users in the newcastle area so how s about a motm/oakley fest
Re: [motm] Layouts
2002-04-16 by George Kisslak
Well said, Tom! (It is with some trepidation I adjoin with this thread, thereby increasing the sense of vexation for a narrow vein of the masses that be,
Re: MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-16 by mmarsh100
A filter bank without a bypass switch is like a hot dog with rice pudding. Who would want that? On the very rare occasion when I want to compare a sound to
Poll results for motm
2002-04-16 by motm@yahoogroups.com
The following motm poll is now closed. Here are the final results: POLL QUESTION: Choose the fixed filterbank design that you prefer. Please vote only once.
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-16 by media.nai@rcn.com
... A gain knob is not at all redundant because depending on the knob settings and source material the unit cannot always be set for unity gain without such a
RE: [motm] Layouts / Knobs
2002-04-16 by Rhen, Kris
... I think module real estate is precious to most of us. Taking up space with blank panels means less space for useful synthesis in favor of better
Re: [motm] Layouts / Knobs
2002-04-16 by elhardt@aol.com
... white noise. Hasn t anybody thought of using some carefully placed blank panels to help group like-things together or breakup that sea of knobs?
Layouts
2002-04-16 by mbedtom@aol.com
Each of us make noises that please us. There is no wrong style of noises that we make. But I don t think that 74 minutes of white noise would do much for
Re: [motm] Re: Ergonomics
2002-04-16 by elhardt@aol.com
Yikes. Endless posts about that damn filterbank. Sometimes I think Paul shouldn t even let people know what a module will look like ahead of time. Nobody
Re: Ergonomics
2002-04-16 by coyoteous
But, the jacks on #2 ARE half way in between the normal grid, right? For me the 1.5 knob spacing is too close to standard to not look funny (funny strange,
RE: [motm] Ergonomics
2002-04-16 by John Loffink
I can see your point. But just because a design is on or off the grid doesn t make it better. I found #2 to be the most balanced layout, without too much
FW: Re: [motm] Laid Out over Layouts!
2002-04-16 by Tkacs, Ken
Using that comparison, though, aren t you saying we shouldn t even label knobs and jacks...? ... Maybe its just me, but I never quite get this argument. It
Re: Re: [motm] Laid Out over Layouts!
2002-04-16 by robs7@aol.com
Maybe its just me, but I never quite get this argument. It reminds me of people wanting to write the letters of the notes onto the keyboard. Last time I
Ergonomics
2002-04-15 by mate_stubb
Interesting - Paul has unintentionally created a monster with the grid . Both he and I attempted to break out of the rigid MOTM grid with the design choices
Grids, Layouts, Ergonomics, etc....
2002-04-15 by Dave Garfield
Hi, MOTM fanz!! (Yeah, me too!) So... I ve just GOT TO chime in here, having used modulars from my PAiA 2720/4700 homebuilt system, to the antique (ca.
Re: [motm] Laid Out over Layouts!
2002-04-15 by sikorsky
... From: Tkacs, Ken hello all, i have a can of worms, and a can opener :-) ... (as ... thinking about it, the way i identify my modules
Re: [motm] Re: Grids, Layouts, Ergonomics
2002-04-15 by J. Larry Hendry
Roger makes a lot of good points here about layout. I ll excuse him for making the dot com decision for perceived ergonomics over sound quality. I voted for
FW: [motm] Laid Out over Layouts!
2002-04-15 by Tkacs, Ken
Wow. Your comments weren t in direct response to me, at least not for anything I ve said *today*, but I feel I have to jump in here. I think you must be taking
Re: [motm] Laid Out over Layouts!
2002-04-15 by Paul Schreiber
Just from my perspective: I will be the first to admit that the overall look of MOTM is boring, but I did NOT want it to look like a Moog. I think that look
Re: [motm] Re: Grids, Layouts, Ergonomics
2002-04-15 by alt-mode
I have been keeping out of the many layout debates flying back and forth but I think Roger has hit home on something here. Uniformity of layout, while a boon
Laid Out over Layouts!
2002-04-15 by thomas white
To offer a different point of view to all who think MOTM is too stringently designed. I built my 40 module home system from the ground up and placed each
Re: Grids, Layouts, Ergonomics
2002-04-15 by mmarsh100
Well, it s clearly not for everybody, then. Curiously, I sold all of my Synth.com stuff because it was noisy. I am most interested in the music that a system
Re: Grids, Layouts, Ergonomics
2002-04-15 by rogerpellegrini
I apologize if this going over old ground, and I understand I may be invoking the wrath of the devoted, but in my humble opinion, the rigid grid MOTM panel
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-15 by jhaible@debitel.net
... You don t really need a pot for makeup gain, because you can do this with the 10 existing pots already. (All 10 pots up can be more than unity gain, and as
RE: [motm] The Ultimate Analog? (No, but this is)
2002-04-15 by Vehorn, Benjamin
I think this one takes the cake: http://www.luraycaverns.com/pages/stalacpipe%20organ.html This is the most mind-boggling instrument I have ever seen first
Re: [motm] MOTM-450 peek
2002-04-15 by media.nai@rcn.com
... Are you 100% sure?? Even with a shoehorn and a bucket of grease, you can t get them in there?? Wasting an entire panel unit just to add a useless bypass
Thomas Henry Supercontroller
2002-04-15 by Inform3r
Can someone please e-mail me Thomas Henry s Polyphony article on the Supercontroller (SN76477)? I d really appreciate it. Thanks, John ...
RE: [motm] The Ultimate Analog? (No, but this is)
2002-04-15 by Alan Wagner
Try the Mighty Wulitzer at the Public Museum here in Grand Rapids, scroll down and check out the details of this monster!!!
MOTM 450 poll- get your votes in!
2002-04-15 by mate_stubb
I ll close the MOTM-450 layout poll within the next 24 hours, so get your votes in! Thanks to all who have already voted. Moe
Robert Rich in Nashville on MOTM
2002-04-15 by Fred Becker
Yesterday I caught Robert Rich s great performance at the Space For Music Festival in Nashville. He featured MOTM prominently on part of his set. He
Re: [motm] The Ultimate Analog? (No, but this is)
2002-04-15 by elhardt@aol.com
Actually here is a picture of the ultimate analog: http://members.aol.com/elhardt2/wersigalaxy.jpg And to hear it in action, listen to a snippet of a Klaus
Re: The Ultimate Analog?
2002-04-15 by Scott Gibbons
... A friend of a friend bought an organ like this several years ago... When he decided that he was serious about getting one, he had to make an addition onto